“research”

twotorrent.jpg        

      Calame, Alexandre. Swiss painter (b. 1810, Vevey, d. 1864, Menton). Mountainous Landscape with a Torrent. 1840. Oil on canvas, 55 x 81 cm. Private collection. Downloaded with express permission from the Web Gallery of Art at http://www.wga.hu from site admin Emil Kren, Ph.D.. Thanks.         

          I don’t like it when a student wants to interview me for a paper and the interview is not necessary for the empirical basis of the study — in other words, the student is just  trying to get ideas from you; like, what is important or  how to conduct their study or how to analyze — i should be getting the grade for the paper! So i first ask what the study is, and what the empirical basis of the study is. Empirical basis; like : a survey, several hundreds respondents; or quantitative and qualitative analysis of content (i usually prefer “comparative”); or a case study of a firm based on first-hand observation. In instances when i’m not part of the empirical basis, the student is just using me to get ideas.       

         Sometimes the student-researchers tell you the study is about  how a certain subject is taught, say, in three big universities, so they’ll ask about your syllabus and  method. And it’s really their topic, believe it or not. But my syllabus is available in the library and the department! And a person’s practice is better observed first-hand, by direct observation  (of course, that’s more time-consuming, but that’s why it’s called a study), rather than asking the person what he or she does or what he or she thinks of what  he or she does, for god’s sake, it’s like a personality interview. (Even if you ask reporters and producers, they’ll tell you i’ve stopped granting personality interviews because i’m not a politician i don’t need to promote  it’s self-indulgent and terribly boring. okay, sometimes i accede if i owe you a favor, ha-ha; or  if  i’m involved in a campaign,  i grant personality interviews but to use it for the campaign). In other words, i don’t approve of that methodology of asking a person what they think of what they do, as methodology of  study. (i’m going to hear whining and complaining; but i’ve known of researchers, or even feature-writers, who actually lived with their subjects; of course, you can’t live with your subjects here under the circumstances, but you can attend some of the person’s classes if that is the subject of the study.)     

            Of course, you could catch me when i’m irritated, like now, in which case you’ll get a mouthful but not necessarily on the subject-matter of your study ha-ha-ha-ha.  Well, i’m not really irritated right now, i just don’t like what i’m reading.   

           In other words, i don’t like giving interviews to researchers  who are doing a study for their own grade or credit when: 1)they are just using you to get ideas on how to do the study (and i’m not their adviser) or 2)the material should be acquired by direct observation. Don’t ask me. (It’s like asking me about my observations of myself, duh.) 

             Of course, it’s going to be more flattering of yourself  if you talk about yourself; but that’s not research.  

      (unless the subject of your research is that. “how people talk about  themselves”, or some-such useless (!)topic.).

        I hope those “researchers” learned something here. 

     (by the way, dear viewers, my comments-section is on moderated mode;  all commenters will get approved most likely; i hope people respect my decision not to make the acquiantance of a creep  (and i’m not referring to ideas which  the   slime  is bereft of  but “creepiness” creep). if you don’t talk to creeps in the real world, why should you be forced to do so here just because you’re blogging, di ba. In the real world, di ba,  we don’t talk to creeps. i know you understand. so just keep posting your comments; except for one. Ang hirap ano; lahat ng commenters  pati readers nadamay. we’ve been kind for too long in this blog, the creep can’t take a hint; but that’s why they’re creeps, they don’t know it. ) 

About these ads

About marichulambino

Pls visit my blog at marichulambino@wordpress.com, i post there daily; i'm not on Facebook/ Twitter or any social network site. Asst submitted this to VP for Acad last week upon request for faculty highlights/ bullet points for the University site: “TOWNS Awardee for Law (The Outstanding Women in the Nation’s Service) 2004-2007. "Marie Claire Magazine launch issue voted and listed as Top 25 Women Who Changed Our Lives (“Top 25 Women Who Rock”, Oct. 21, 2005). "Philippine Graphic Magazine voted and listed as the Top 25 Young Leaders for 2004, anniversary issue. "Award, 16th Anniversary, Ombudsman’s Office: 'selfless service, dedication, tireless efforts in assisting the Office of the Ombudsman for in the prosecution of the plunder case against former President Joseph Estrada'. "Citation for excellent public service, Special Prosecutor, Ombudsman’s Office for her work in the plunder case People vs. Estrada, Oct. 17, 2007 upon successful termination of the case. "Tribute, Philippine Collegian 2001 as 'private prosecutor, for integrity held above price, for service freely given, for truth steadfastly pursued, for embracing the ideals of the Philippine Collegian beyond the confines of the University.' "Award, St. Scholastica Student Council July 6, 2001 'for her undying patriotism, love and service to all her Filipino countrymen.' "Tribute, Konggreso ng Mamamayang Pilipino (KOMPIL) (Congress of Filipino Citizens) for helping in the fight against corruption in the highest offices of the land and for upholding justice, 2002. "1996 Award of Merit from U.P. Diliman: 'In recognition of her dedicated and exemplary services as U.P. Diliman Chief Legal Officer ...pioneering efforts, outstanding leadership, team-building skills, administrative competence...' "Visiting Forces Agreement case, delivered the oral arguments in the Supreme Court for main petitioner, Bayan, in Bayan et al vs. Executive Secretary. "Her case Posadas, Torres-Yu, & Lambino vs. Dizon (NBI), et al, on attempted invalid warrantless arrests on-campus, is now included in criminal law and criminal procedure textbooks, syllabus, and lectures in MCLE"

Posted on March 27, 2008, in embargo and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

comments are welcome anytime

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: