(Or, notes on the part of the work that will not be written in your accomplishment report)

    Administrative work shouldn’t be too difficult if it were just a matter of implementing a program and keeping house (or pushing paper to keep the office running).

     But it isn’t just that — that isn’t even the hard part of it.

     It’s about managing conflicts and presiding over clashing interests, which for your own safety you should  able to identify early on because  some of the proponents of those interests want to destroy everything in its way, even you.

      There are individuals who cause unnecessary conflicts.

      Unnecessary, because their forms of “aggression” are meant only to advance their own interests and not  any program that would benefit others. They sow intrigue and spread lies because they are dissatisfied with the efforts made to support  their “careers”, or their properties, or their vast holdings,  or their ambitions.  They have a sense of entitlement. That is the phrase you’re looking for. They’ve been granted the most — and they want more. And they will start to publicly blame you in the hope that that would undermine everything. Fortunately, they don’t have any support, and  enjoy no credibility. Be alert and deprive them of whatever capability they have left to do more harm, peacefully and legally.

      There are  those who want to use you as a tool to whack at someone, their “enemy”,  so they could promote themselves or members of their group.  If it were up to them, they would give you no peace until they are able to wrench the lifeblood out of their “enemy” by using you. They know no rest and want you to feel the same. You have to secure a perimeter around yourself in dealing with these people.

      You have to know how to manage conflicts – and for your own health, you have to put  designated hours for it. At the end of those hours, messages, statements, and other forms of pressure should not be allowed to have any effect on you,  unless the lives of a large number of people, or  their well-being, are on the line. (Woe unto you if all your messages involve the  safety of large numbers of people all the time –  you should have shifts.)

         There are  conflicts that are necessary – those deserve your time and energy.  Disagreements over substance, and even form, disagreements over matters that involve public safety, or law-enforcement and killings, or corruption and governance – disagreements whether it is even politically correct to blame the victims for getting killed, blaming fishermen for drowning  during a storm or blaming children of poor families for being caught in floods, blaming reporters and media organizations  for the government’s incompetence in containing hostage-taking situations, or blaming murdered journalists  for getting killed because they did not observe ethics perfectly.

      Those are worth fighting over, or fighting for.

      You have to identify the petty and the pompous  — and put a limit to what they can do.

    Pay attention to the significant and the substantial.

    And finally, the best way to handle  the hostilities being fomented by the imperial and self-important is to unify the people around you by convincing them that the plan that had been agreed upon is the better way. This takes time and patience, many hours of consultations and conversations and walking and writing and listening to everyone.

     Unfortunately, this difficult aspect of the work is the part that doesn’t go into the accomplishment report.

     A young policy-maker we met a couple of months ago said:          “We should not be attached to the offices and posts that we hold. No matter how big or small. These institutions will outlive us. They’ll have to continue long after we  are gone. We can make them better, then be prepared to leave them in  better state to those next, after us, when it is time.”

         There’s a crass version of the quote  from, of all places,  a Hollywood blockbuster action movie. (You know i’m a sucker for bubblegum, fast-paced formula-based,  well-filmed action movies, don’t you).  The villain-character, a dysfunctional, criminal physicist, threw back a line at his billionaire-patron:

     In his Rusian accent, in between his gold-plated teeth, he said:

     “Duwnt (don’t)…. geet (get) attached… to  theengs (things).”

    “Leearrn (learn) tuh (to)… liet (let) guh (go)…”     

      But… don’t you get it?

      For the obsessed, letting go requires, ironically,  a lot of discipline. For the insatiable and the power-hungry, letting go, when the end is near, requires grace.   

About these ads

Published by: marichulambino

Pls visit my site at, i post there daily; i'm not on Facebook/ Twitter or any social network site. Asst submitted this to VP for Acad last week upon request for faculty highlights/ bullet points for the University site: “TOWNS Awardee for Law (The Outstanding Women in the Nation’s Service) 2004-2007. "Marie Claire Magazine launch issue voted and listed as Top 25 Women Who Changed Our Lives (“Top 25 Women Who Rock”, Oct. 21, 2005). "Philippine Graphic Magazine voted and listed as the Top 25 Young Leaders for 2004, anniversary issue. "Award, 16th Anniversary, Ombudsman’s Office: 'selfless service, dedication, tireless efforts in assisting the Office of the Ombudsman for in the prosecution of the plunder case against former President Joseph Estrada'. "Citation for excellent public service, Special Prosecutor, Ombudsman’s Office for her work in the plunder case People vs. Estrada, Oct. 17, 2007 upon successful termination of the case. "Tribute, Philippine Collegian 2001 as 'private prosecutor, for integrity held above price, for service freely given, for truth steadfastly pursued, for embracing the ideals of the Philippine Collegian beyond the confines of the University.' "Award, St. Scholastica Student Council July 6, 2001 'for her undying patriotism, love and service to all her Filipino countrymen.' "Tribute, Konggreso ng Mamamayang Pilipino (KOMPIL) (Congress of Filipino Citizens) for helping in the fight against corruption in the highest offices of the land and for upholding justice, 2002. "1996 Award of Merit from U.P. Diliman: 'In recognition of her dedicated and exemplary services as U.P. Diliman Chief Legal Officer ...pioneering efforts, outstanding leadership, team-building skills, administrative competence...' "Visiting Forces Agreement case, delivered the oral arguments in the Supreme Court for main petitioner, Bayan, in Bayan et al vs. Executive Secretary. "Her case Posadas, Torres-Yu, & Lambino vs. Dizon (NBI), et al, on attempted invalid warrantless arrests on-campus, is now included in criminal law and criminal procedure textbooks, syllabus, and lectures in MCLE"

Categories health, The News MediaTags , , Leave a comment

comments are welcome anytime

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s