<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://marichulambino.com/2026/05/24/the-international-after-seeing-vid-quote-of-justice-marvic-referring-to-art59-on-bato-arrest-tro-denied-hmm-%f0%9f%a4%94-the-icc-pre-trial-ch-po-did-not-use-art59-po-because-it-used-residual-jurisd/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>marichulambino.com</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-05-24T15:48:30+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>The International. After seeing vid quote of Justice Marvic referring to Art59 on Bato arrest-TRO-denied: Hmm 🤔 The ICC Pre-Trial Ch po did NOT use Art59 po, because it used residual jurisdiction over a non-State-Party, Art59 does NOT apply to non-State-Parties</news:title><news:keywords>dailyprompt, dailyprompt-2771</news:keywords></news:news></url></urlset>
