Argument for the prosecution, argument for the defense

Argument for the prosecution, argument for the defense

Dear Jack,

      tell you what: let’s  argue both sides to be fair to everyone:

      For the prosecution: that the photos were taken openly, by a non- law enforcement person, and also therefore the parties knew they were being photographed, therefore, can be admitted in evidence;

        For the defense: that the photos were taken surreptitiously by a law- enforcement agent, and also the parties did not know, therefore did not consent, therefore, can be rendered inadmissible.

        (I try not to write a full legal opinion for the blog — it’s free. Thanks for stopping by and writing!)

                     Regards.

                                              marichu