postscript to kidnaps: Basilan kidnapping, Baselco employees


(Satellite image by Google Maps at http://www.maps.google.com used here for educational, non-commercial purposes under the terms of service of said site. Basilan, site of the kidnap, is the spot marked with a small red balloon with the letter “A” inside. You can close the dialog balloon by clicking the “x” of the balloon. You can zoom in by clicking the + sign or plus sign at the left-hand corner of the image; you can zoom in by as much as four times and see the color of roofs of houses; zoom out by clicking the – sign or minus sign; you can pan, or move across the image, by clicking any of the arrows at the left-hand corner of the image. When you zoom in, you have to pan downwards to still see Basilan. The satellite image is of course not real-time.)

The Baselco kidnap hostages, four employees of the Basilan Electric Cooperative, have been released, thanks to the local government negotiating committee led by Basilan Vice Governor Al Rasheed Sakahalul. According to the media, the kidnappers were widely believed to be ASG. While the police and local government authorities have a tried-and-tested formula for handling kidnap-for-ransom situations, there are no guarantees.

Apparently, in many instances, silent negotiations can be productive while heightening the publicity raises the ransom demand; i don’t know; as i said, the police have their “tried and tested” methods. Concerned friends and groups who call the attention of the public while the kidnap is on-going, do so only because they feel, or they think, or they can see, that government authorities may not do enough or are not doing anything if/ because there is not enough public pressure on government to do its job. On the other hand, those who prefer silent negotiations, most of the time family members and close friends, are too afraid to make a mistake where a loved one’s life is at stake.

In the first few hours, or first few days where you need to establish communication lines with the captors of your loved ones, you’ll probably have to do a silent search by activating or mobilizing all, any, and whatever contacts you may have. But when no communication lines open in the first few hours or first few days (please don’t ask me how many hours or days, i don’t have a formula, i’m just basing this on former clients who’ve had missing relatives); when no communication lines open in the first few hours, or first few days, the longer you keep quiet without getting any info, the farther away your missing loved one would be; in other words, the possibility of finding him/her becomes more remote; so the family members have to decide when it’s time to raise hell when no useful information is forthcoming.

Handling kidnap for ransom is different from handling missing relatives who are politically active, and whom you think are in the hands of government security forces (as documented by Amnesty Internationale).

Apparently, in this country, the kidnap-for-ransom gangs can be talked with, can be bargained with, can be given something in exchange for the hostage; but will behead the hostage if negotiations fall through.

Government security forces who snatch activists as documented by Amnesty Internationale on the other hand operate under a veneer of “anti-communist ideology” and “anti-communist self-righteousness” that they think are non-negotiable, and think nothing of “disappearing” their captives.

The first are lawless elements, the second think they are above the law.

The first can be wiped out by professional law-enforcement: systematic gathering of intel information, identification, pursuit, arrests, etc. The second, when it is unofficially abetted by government, can be resolved only by the abatement of the regime that enables it.

The “predicted” doomsday earthquake on July 18, Modern-day Nostradamus, & Art. 154 RPC

      

   (Michael Parks. The Creation. Right-clicked from www.allposters.com, used here for  educational, non-commercial purposes, free service by blog-use of image provided by and from said site)        

        I know. We shouldn’t pay attention to practically anonymous, unidentified, unconfirmed, unverified, non-scientific predictions of the end of the world, like the letter circulating through  on-line journals, emails, and blogs from a supposed Brazilian teacher who has supposedly made 80,000 correct predictions, and who predicted today  of a  deadly earthquake on July 18, 2008, Friday. (see www.inquirer.net, Saksi of Channel 7, and DZMM news.) Repent! Repent, for the kingdom of heaven… (i’m using my Robert  Powell British accent)  is at hand! (actually, that wasn’t the line of Robert  Powell, he was on a hill and spoke of the beatitudes, “Blessed are you when men shall revile you, and persecute you. …etc.” and he said in his British accent : “Rejoice…and be exceedingly glad. For the kingdom of heaven… is at hand.” It was a gentle, happy scene.)

        But so widespread has the circulation of the letter been in the internet  that the Philippine Institute for  Volcanology  and Seismology (Philvolcs) through its director, Renato Solidum Jr., came out with a statement saying “there was no basic science behind it.”

       So many people have nothing to do that they have the time and the cluelessness to forward any garbage email that they get through the cellphone or their computers. Are you one of them?  

       Anyway, here’s a little-known provision in the Revised Penal Code, Article 154. I don’t like this provision, among many other provisions in the crime book. (Whenever i cite or quote provisions in the Revised Penal Code, it doesn’t mean i like those provisions. It just means they’re there. They’re laws. I bring them up because as long as they’re laws they can be enforced, and no one’s doing anything about them):

        Anyway, here it is: The first paragraph punishes  (1) the publication “as news any false news” (that’s one element, (2) “which may endanger the public order” (that’s the other element), or  “cause damage to the interest or credit of the State (that’s the alternative element; alternative to the second); as follows:

      (One may argue that this may not apply to the internet;  prosecution lawyers might tell you : “matters of defense.” It means you can raise it if you want to, in your defense.  On the other hand “publication” can be construed to also  include materials disseminated through the  internet.  You can raise your defenses.)

      “Revised Penal Code. Art. 154. Unlawful use of means of publication and unlawful utterances. – The penaltyof arresto mayor and a fine ranging from 200 to 1,000 pesos shall be imposed upon:

     “1.Any person who by means of printing, lithography, or any other means  of publication shall publish or cause to be published as news any false news which may endanger the public order, or cause damage to the interest or credit of the State.  XXXX”

       The “report” has to potentially endanger the public order, e.g., it may cause panic.

         But how does one measure that? It says “may”. Predictive.  

       Are you about to punish someone for his predictions based on your  own prediction of the possible  consequence of public disorder? (i told you, i have to suppress my philosophic side….)

         Anyway. That’s the provision. Like all other provisions in the Revised Penal Code, it  requires criminal intent. So, it may be asked, “What if i honestly believed the prediction to be true?”

          Matters  of defense.

        The tricky thing about Nostradamuses, doomsday predictions, panic, public disorder, and the Revised Penal Code, is of course obvious.  If they were true, nothing more and nothing else matters. Live and love to the fullest. (The late Christopher Reeves when asked for advice, once said: “use your best linen. Use them everyday.”)