Dear Ms. “Elvira Brent”: i was surprised to read your letter (see widget). I’m waiting for the evidence, like any discerning lawyer watching these events. The series of questions i asked there, Ma’am, (blog post :
| (w/ belated breaking news update) Of the publicly known allegations: On Mayor Isnaji and the kidnapping in Sulu ) |
was an illustration of how to “pin down” the police, and PNP Chief Avelino Razon. They’re cross questions (cross questions are cross examination questions; cross examination questions are usually leading questions, they make the witness say “Yes” to certain allegations then the series of “Yesses” would show the lack of logic of the witness in arriving at his/her conclusions) they “pin down” the lack of logic of the police—when i asked there: First you (the police) said it was the Abu Sayyaf, yes? Yeess; now you (the police) said it was the MNLF? The theory of the police lacked logic. And then i even finished by saying “curiouser and curiouser” quoting from Lewis Caroll’s “Alice in Wonderland”. Since you cursed me in your comment for something i did not do, I would appreciate an apology, pero okey lang if it is not given. I’d want readers to see this. Here’s one more tip or suggestion (aside from those series of cross questions that show the lack of logic of the police): the photos could even be expunged from the evidence and rendered inadmissible; inadmissible means they cannot be used in evidence against the Isnajis. It means the Court can be compelled to ignore those photos if they are rendered inadmissible in evidence. Thank you for writing. (Also: for all commenters: Dear commenters: widgets are those boxes on the right-hand side, they have avatars; avatars are like a person’s logo or symbol in the internet; for commenters who don’t have avatars, the program arbitrarily generates avatars for them. it’s not me. the computer generates them. Thank you.)
