Nobody looked carefully at the SWS press releases published by Businessworld and mindlessly used by leading broadsheet editors,  and nobody asked the following question:  

      The SWS press release on the survey on the next President used the survey result which asked respondents to GIVE THREE NAMES on who could be the next President;  BUT for the vice president survey, it used and released the survey result which asked the respondents for only ONE NAME, or: “Whom would you vote for Vice President should elections be held today?” (asked for only ONE NAME, name of the candidate they would vote for vice president ).  Here are the links to the SWS media releases of their “Third Quearter 2015 Social Weather Survey” so you can see for yourself instead of relying on the mindless reporting of the broadsheets:

http://sws.org.ph/

   http://www.sws.org.ph/pr20150921c.htm

       WHY? WHY? BAKIT? ANO ANG DAHILAN? WHAT IS THE EXPLANATION? BAKIT GANUN? WHY IS THE SWS SELECTIVE IN ITS RELEASE OF INFO ON SURVEY RESULTS?

     The “explanation” of an SWS representative that the question they asked for the next President (three names) was the usual question they have been using since 2007, and which they have been using since the filing of candidacy has not started — is NOT availing because: for Vice President, they have a survey result based on a question which asked respondents for only one name for Vice President. The SWS explanation cannot be relied upon —

     And no one is asking the SWS: Why is there a disparity in the kind of survey result info being released for the next President and for the next VP.

WHY? WHY? BAKIT? ANO ANG DAHILAN? WHAT IS THE EXPLANATION? BAKIT GANUN? WHY IS THE SWS SELECTIVE IN ITS RELEASE OF INFO ON SURVEY RESULTS?

   Those candidates who are “elated” (see inquirer.net) over the released info of SWS should be careful what they are “elated” about.

Nobody asked SWS:

     Since you conducted a 3rd quarter survey that asked for only one name for Vice President: IS THERE A 3rd QUARTER SURVEY THAT ASKED 1,200 RESPONDENTS NATIONWIDE FOR ONLY ONE NAME FOR PRESIDENT? (or if none,  what is the explanation for the disparity, the inconsistency, lack of sense and logic in difference of questions used for Pres and Vice Pres) Whyyy whyyy whyyyy?