#UPDiliman CMC Office of Research & Publication Brownbag series. Online Libel Nov. 23, 4pm

#UPDiliman CMC Office of Research & Publication Brownbag series. Online Libel Nov. 23, 4pm

click “Listen in browser” for the rhetorical Q “… have you ever met a hater doing better than you ? — me neither”

The University of the Philippines Diliman

College of Mass Communication

Office of Research & Publication invites you to the 

CMC Research Brownbag Series   featuring

 

the Ramon Cojuangco Professorial Chair Presentation on the State of the Prosecution for Online Libel:

         “The Revengers:

The Meteoric Rise in Numbers of Online Libel Complaints in the Era of the Cybercrime Prevention Act, RA 10175″  by Marichu C. Lambino,

on Nov. 23, 2017, Thursday, 4:00pm, PhilStar 2, Plaridel Hall, UPCMC, University of the Philippines Diliman

Presentation: “The Revengers: The Meteoric Rise in Numbers of Online Libel Complaints” (the Ramon Cojuangco Professorial Chair Presentation) Nov. 23

 

(On mobile device: Click “Listen in browser” on the soundcloud pod below for the OPM song “Balita” (“News”) by Kat Alano, this song is rated PG 13 by blog admin for containing one slang cuss word)

PUBLIC INVITATION

You are invited to 

The Ramon Cojuangco Professorial Chair Presentation

on the status of the prosecution of online libel cases:

“The Revengers:
The Meteoric Rise in Numbers
of Online Libel Complaints
in the Era of the
Cybercrime Prevention Act
RA 10175″
by
Marichu C. Lambino
November 23, 2017, Thursday, at 4:00 pm at the Phil Star 2 (Big Room), 2/F Plaridel Hall, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City,

Metro Manila.

IRR Cybercrime Law & non-libelous rants (Bonus for Media Law students)

IRR for the Cybercrime Prevention Act

Examples of “outrageous” non-libelous rants

(Bonus for Media Law students)

Bonus questions for media law students. Instructions: For five points, please give your suggested provisions for the  Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Cybercrime Prevention Act, with the purpose of preventing harassment suits against media practitioners and netizens, bearing in mind the topics taken up in class on defenses in libel/ exemption from punishment (points will be given on a “first-come-first-served” basis: do not repeat answers that have been posted). The bonus points will be added to the examinee’s score for the third quarterly test. Please post your complete answers in the comments section of this post or in your own platform (if the latter: please paste the link in the comments section).You may use a pseudonym (in which case, give R your real name) or your student number.  (deadline: 12 noon of Feb. 25, 2014, EDSA people’s uprising anniversary).  For ease of evaluating your answers, please use the format provided below and fill in the blanks:

In addition to the grounds provided for in the Rules of Court, the following shall constitute grounds for the dismissal of any libel complaint:

If the statement, communication, report, comment, is:

1.__________________________ ____________________________________________

2.____________________________ _________________________________________

3._____________________________. ________________________________________

        The investigating prosecutor shall motu proprio dismiss the libel complaint if, on its face, the complaint shows that the complainant or the person subject matter of the statement, communication, report, is a ___________________ or a ____________________ and the statement, communication or  report is __________________________________________________________.  

        For another 5 points, please post or re-post here what you consider as your most “outrageous rant” or expression of disgust, condemnation, disapproval, disparagement, etc., and explain why it a form of privileged fair comment (the commentary should be a minimum of 146 characters/letters). You may use other netizens’ rant or expression of disgust, etc. Do not use posts of professional journalists or columnists. In  the second paragraph, explain why the statement is considered a form of privileged fair comment and provide the legal basis.  (deadline: 12 noon of Feb. 25, 2014, no extension)