“May kumuha sa akin” (“some people took me”)- Rodolfo “Jun” Lozada (direct witness to ZTE contract- negotiations)

“Nandito ako sa departure area, may kumuha sa akin” (i’m here at the departure area, some people took me away”) was one of the last text messages that witness Rodolfo “Jun” Lozada was able to send his brother an hour ago.

       They took him; spirited away by “unknown men” when he stepped on the tarmac of the NAIA (airport) an hour ago; these men are powerful enough or have enough authorization to be standing at the airport tarmac waiting for him.  Rodolfo “Jun” Lozada  is now being denied access to his own cellphone, is being deprived of his liberty, held against his will, his family members interviewed on DZMM are looking for him, the Senate security members who were supposed to take him into custody on the strength of a Senate arrest warrant, are looking for him and,  if DZMM reports are accurate, presently chasing the vehicle that whisked him away.   

         Rodolfo “Jun” Lozada is a  technical consultant on IT matters of  then NEDA secretary-general Romulo Neri.  A couple of years ago, Mr. Neri asked him to assist him in evaluating the ZTE contract and  in which capacity he joined the trips to China. If the information of Joey de Venecia is accurate, he  has  direct and personal knowledge of how $200 million in commissions changed hands during the contract- negotiation of the ZTE broadband deal.  He left for Hongkong or London last week and came back today.      

      His passage thru the airport was under the supervision of General Angel  Atutubo, Deputy Chief  of airport security. According to witnesses, he was the person last seen with Mr. Lozada. 

      What is the  number of General Atutubo and if true, upon whose orders was Mr. Lozada taken? Is Atutubo  still part of the AFP command structure and therefore under the command of Esperon  or, being airport security and civilian, is he under the control and supervision of the Bureau of Immigration and Bureau of Customs?    

         If the reports are true, those who have custody of Rodolfo  “Jun” Lozada against his will  and all those who ordered this operation , if private persons or non-police, are presently committing  or can be charged with illegal detention or, if accompanied with threats against the life of the person ,kidnapping; grave coercion; obstruction of justice. If those who have custodyof him against his will are public officers, they can be charged with arbitrary detention, grave coercion, obstruction of justice.  

    Surface  Rodolfo “Jun” Lozada and return him to his family now.

     (family members and friends of Mr. Lozada  who may have any contacts in the airport security staff or the PSG or immigration: Now is the time to use those contacts  and activate a silent search; the longer it takes, the more remote the probability becomes of locating the person. The legal remedy is to immediately execute affidavits, for those who last communicated with Mr. Lozada  or those who last saw him, stating the facts and the persons who have control and supervision of his passage thru the airport; and file a petition for the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus before  a Pasay city court, or the CA or the SC, naming those persons who have control of his passage thru the airport, and  all their  superiors and principal; then talk to the executive judge or the Clerk of Court  on the urgency of the matter so it could be calendared and heard on the same day tomorrow. The Senate, which issued the warrant of arrest on the other hand can try locate the persons last seen with Mr. Lozada, e.g., airport security, and ask them to surface the witness; if the Senate security has reasonable ground to believe that he is being kept in any enclosure, they can use reasonable force to break into such enclosure to effect the arrest and take custody of Mr. Lozada.)