Witness Prep Ethics: Lawyers, listen up

Witness Prep (From the Syllabus of U.P. LL.M School Prof. Janice Lee, “Cross-Border Ethics”, with guest speaker today , International Arbitration practitioner and member of the Switzerland, Germany, England, and Wales bar, Prof. Johannes Landbrecht, PhD.

(Many thanks to Prof. Jay, S.J.D., for making this available)

“First, a lawyer may discuss the case with the witnesses before they testify. A lawyer … has an ethical and legal duty to investigate the facts of the case, and the investigation typically requires the lawyer to talk with the witnesses — the people who know what happened on the occasion in question.
“Moreover, the adversary system benefits by allowing lawyers to prepare witnesses so that they can deliver their testimony efficiently, persuasively, comfortably, and in conformity with the rules of evidence.
“Second, when a lawyer discusses the case with a witness, the lawyer must not try to bend the witness’s story or put words in the witness’s mouth. As an old New York disciplinary case puts it: “[The lawyer’s duty is to extract the facts from the witness, not to pour them into him; to learn what the witness does know, not to teach him what he ought to know.”
“Third, a lawyer can be disciplined by the bar for counseling or assisting a witness to testify falsely or for knowingly offering testimony that the lawyer knows is false.” (Wydick, 1995. The Ethics of Witness Coaching)

If the comment posted does not appear here, that's because COMMENTS WITH SEVERAL HYPERLINKS ARE DETAINED BY AKISMET AT THE SPAM FOLDER.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.