Diplomacy 101: the President took full responsibility & apologized without ifs or buts (no, not PNoy; Barack)

     “Obama takes blame for strike that killed hostages by: Andrew Beatty, Agence France-Presse
 “President Barack Obama said he took “full responsibility” on Thursday for the accidental killing of an American and Italian hostage during an apparent drone strike on an Al-Qaeda compound in Pakistan.
        “Lifting the lid on a classified operation, a solemn Obama expressed his “deepest apologies” to the families of 73-year-old economic advisor Warren Weinstein and 39-year-old aid worker Giovanni Lo Porto.
         “Obama gave few details of the botched action, which officials suggested was a drone strike that took place on an Al-Qaeda lair in January after hundreds of hours of surveillance.
          “The strike also killed Ahmed Faruq, an American described as a leader of Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent.
         “It was also revealed that Al-Qaeda’s English-language spokesman, a California rocker-turned jihadist, Adam Gadahn, died in a separate strike.
          “The White House said neither Al-Qaeda member was specifically targeted, raising further questions about the credibility of US intelligence.
      “ ‘As president and as commander-in-chief, I take full responsibility for all our counterterrorism operations, including the one that inadertently took the lives of Warren and Giovanni,’ Obama said.
       “ ‘I profoundly regret what happened. On behalf of the United States government, I offer our deepest apologies to the families.
         “ ‘It is a cruel and bitter truth that in the fog of war generally and our fight against terrorists specifically, mistakes — sometimes deadly mistakes — can occur.’
         “Obama said he informed Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi personally about his administration’s findings.
         “Italy’s foreign ministry described the deaths as a ‘tragic and fatal error by our US allies’ but said ‘terrorists’were entirely to blame.”
 ♠   ♠   ♠

        As everybody knows, this is the SOP whenever a tragedy results from an operation approved by the Office of the President — to show your face and take full responsibility. The protocol does not include hiding after the news had broken out and disappearing  for three days, or attending the launch and party of a car manufacturer while the bodies of the fallen are being officially received by the families and the government.  it does not include fending off questions with “let’s wait for the investigation report” (then, later disowning that investigation report) 

        It does not include  sheepishly introducing in your speech: “the ground commander did not follow my instructions! i told him to coordinate.” Or ruing: “the chief of the operations fooled me, he deceived me!” Or consoling the bereaved families by explaining the strategy with “marunong ba kayo maglaro ng computer games… (do you know how to play computer games”).

      Diplomacy 101, with too little and too late into the PNoy presidency. 

         to be fair, PNoy is not perceived to have been involved in any major corruption scandal.

       Life happened — deaths occurred in catastrophic circumstances, in the the tens of thousands, or thru major sacrifices,  during his term and he felt he had to be defensive —             there lies the hubris of the Liberal Party.

Oblicon and the peace agreement

They call it “Oblicon”. Do you think that the peace agreement between the government of the Philippines (GPH) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) is governed by the Chapter on Obligations and Contracts (Oblicon) of the Civil Code of the Philippines and the Notarial Law of the Philippines? This is the bases of the legal opinion of a resource person in saying that the peace agreement between the GPH and MILF cannot be enforced for not being in conformity with certain formal requirements. Anyari.

     there are general principles of law on contracts that can be applied analogously to all kinds of agreements, but not as to formal requirements.

      the armed conflict,  and the political settlement of the armed conflict, is governed by underlying principles of humanitarian law and the   jus cogen  on the settlement of armed conflicts worldwide or the accepted general norms on the settlement of armed conflicts. yun lang– o may bayad na yan 🙂  … hwag ka galit i’m writing a law memo, singit lang ito