“That in so strange a time…. Common integrity could look like courage”

 

  Painting by Diego Rivera. Peasants. Used here for  educational, non-commercial purposes, free service by blog-use of image provided by and from www.allposters.com

        

           quote “Lawyers, Jails, and the Law’s Fake Bargains” by Michael Tigar, July-August 2001 issue of Monthly Review at     http://www.monthlyreview.org/0701tigar.htm

(FINAL excerpts (third and final installment)  of a 15-page article by Michael Tigar; excerpted by this blog)

    (Michael Tigar is an American University Washington College of  Law Professor  (Constitutional Law; Supreme Court; French legal system; criminal law and procedure; human rights); one of the most renowned lawyers in the United States;  has argued seven cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and more than 100 appellate cases; written extensively about litigation, aspects of trial practice, criminal law, the death penalty, and the role of the criminal  defense lawyer. His books include Fighting Injustice (ABA, 2002); Federal Appeals: Jurisdiction and Practice; and Examining Witnesses;  has been active in pro bono cases, the American Bar Association, continuing legal education programs, and international human rights. During the apartheid period, he went to South Africa to train black lawyers. Prior to joining AU, Tigar served as a professor at the University of Texas Law School)

       Quote “xxxx  People of color are under-represented in the ranks of lawyers, and only in the past twenty years have any significant number of Chicano lawyers entered the profession, when entry is measured in percentage of the Chicano population. Once in the legal profession, people of color tend to be relegated to its lowest rungs and face race-based obstacles to advancement. One ticket to advancement is to abandon the cause of racial justice. Law school programs designed to redress historic inequality are increasingly under attack.

          XXXX

      Quote “It is a wonder that there is much challenge at all to the system this issue describes, yet there are challenges. xxxx   In Law and the Rise of Capitalism, reissued in a new edition in 2000, I discussed the role and importance of these lawyers. They do not stand at the center of events, but they assist those who are at the center or who are brought into conflict with the state. Lawyers help to turn claims for justice into coherent demands and principles. They may show the open spaces within an old system, where change can be successful. When the open spaces close up, they can help define the conditions on which a new order will be created.

       Quote “Some question my picture of lawyers’ potential role. Yet in struggle after struggle, fighters for justice have drawn on legal ideology. Nelson Mandela and Oliver Tambo were lawyers, and their continued calls for justice were phrased in terms of the legal ideology that would emerge in a transformed South Africa.

       Quote “Honorable public defenders and appointed counsel, of whom there are many, fight the system one battle at a time. We salute them, while remembering Yevgeny Yevtushenko’s words:

 

How sharply our children will be ashamed

Taking at last their vengeance for these horrors

That in so strange a time

Common integrity could look like courage

      Quote “In some law schools, such as Washington College of Law, American University, where I teach, clinical legal education helps to prepare lawyers to meet the challenges that this system poses. Nationally, however, only about 3 percent of law graduates go into public interest law, compared with some 15 percent twenty-five years ago. At WCL, we manage to place about three times the national average in such jobs. But restrictions on funding for defender services, state and federal, have seriously eroded the job opportunities in that sector. Meanwhile, the law graduate who goes into public interest work will earn less than 20 percent of what a graduate who enters private practice can expect. Twenty-five years ago, the disparity was much less—about half. Concerned law students should join up with such progressive organizations as the National Lawyers Guild.

      Quote “However, human rights organizations have creatively attacked the system’s unfairness by class action lawsuits that further the demands of many defendants and target entire jail or prosecutorial systems. XXXXX

       Quote “The large-scale class action is significant for the same reason that civil rights litigation of the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s played a constructive role. Given the real world of conservative judges, this kind of litigation faces significant obstacles to courtroom success. Like much class suit litigation, however, the lawsuit can serve as a means to focus public attention on issues. It can and should be part of a broader organizing effort. In this arena as in others, the community’s demands and needs, and not the lawyer’s view of the world, have pride of place.

 

Quote “SOURCES

Quote “1)Angela Jordan Davis, The American Prosecutor: Independence, Power and the Threat of Tyranny, 86 Iowa L. Rev. 393 (2001) contains many useful citations. 2)The Supreme Court case on lawyer speech is Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S. 1030 (1991). It must be noted, however, that the Court did reverse the disciplinary action against Mr. Gentile on first amendment grounds, while a separate majority of the Court set a standard for future cases.3)The case limiting the appointed lawyer’s representation to the specific case is Texas v. Cobb, No. 99-1702 (April 2, 2001). 4)The study of death penalty counsel is part of a superb Symposium, Carter Center Symposium on the Death Penalty, 14 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 329 (1998). 5)Ineffective assistance of counsel cases include Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).6)On waiver of rights, see Michael E. Tigar, Foreword: Waiver of Constitutional Rights: Disquiet in the Citadel, 84 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (1970). 7)The New York Times articles ran April 8-10, 2001, and are on the Times website at  

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/08/nyregion/08LAWY.html;

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/09/nyregion/09LEGA.html;

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/10/nyregion/10LAWY.html.

 

Quote “8)The Mississippi case is Neal v. Puckett, 2001 WL 43274 (5th Cir. 2001).” Closed-quote.

 

 

 

 

Those alleged rice hoarders, the raids, the NBI and Department of Justice: What the President doesn’t know

    Painting by Franz Marc. Fighting Forms.  32 x 24 in. Used here for  educational, non-commercial purposes, free service by blog-use of image provided by and from www.allposters.com

    

          The President yesterday literally sat at the preliminary investigation  of alleged rice hoarders at the Department of Justice, on its fourth or sixth week, all the time – as reported by the press- glancing at her watch as part of her body language to communicate that she was getting impatient.

        What the President doesn’t know is there’s such a thing as inquest. Which takes half a day or two days. And not six weeks like what the DOJ is doing with the P.I.. Duh.

      That is what you get for keeping political appointee Raul Gonzales whose only “qualification” is his canine loyalty (with apologies to dogs and dog lovers). You have to go to the DOJ every other week, while your DOJ secretary a couple of weeks ago justified his snail’s pace (with apologies to snails) by saying (in an interview): “Well, the President is not a lawyer. She doesn’t know there should be a preliminary investigation …”

      Her dogs are running circles around her. What the President doesn’t know is if the respondents/ suspects were in flagrante delicto,  they can be brought in for inquest. Since some if not all of the respondents were proceeded against after a “raid” or a valid warrantless search of rice warehouses, and  prima facie  evidence of hoarding were found  (“undue accumulation beyond the normal inventory levels” etc.) the owners thereof could have been inquested  (they could ask to sign a waiver later and ask to avail of the statutory right of prelim investigation, but did the NBI make an effort to inquest?). Inquest takes 12 to 48 hours. Not six weeks of preliminary investigation.

      The  President deserves Raul Gonzales. Let her dogs run circles around her while she sits crammed in preliminary investigations as part of her publicity stunts. Maybe the NBI and NFA were not sure of what they were doing during those raids. Maybe they were not sure that the amount of the inventory was prima facie evidence of  hoarding as to be punishable. And that was why they didn’t make any arrests, valid warrantless, and therefore: no inquests were done. They probably think they’ll just ride this out and go through the motions while the President needs to build a good press.  

      Some pertinent provisions:

       Quote “RA 7581. SECTION 5.    Illegal Acts of Price Manipulation. — Without prejudice to the provisions of existing laws on goods not covered by this Act, it shall be unlawful for any person habitually engaged in the production, manufacture, importation, storage, transport, distribution, sale or other methods of disposition of goods to engage in the following acts of price manipulation of the price of any basic necessity or prime commodity.

 

     Quote “1)Hoarding, which is the undue accumulation by a person or combination of persons of any basic commodity beyond his or their normal inventory levels or the unreasonable limitation or refusal to dispose of, sell or distribute the stocks of any basic necessity of prime commodity to the general public or the unjustified taking out of any basic necessity or prime commodity from the channels of reproduction, trade, commerce and industry. There shall be prima facie evidence of hoarding when a person has stocks of any basic necessity or prime commodity fifty percent (50%) higher than his usual inventory and unreasonably limits, refuses or fails to sell the same to the general public at the time of discovery of the excess. The determination of a person’s usual inventory shall be reckoned from the third month immediately preceding before the discovery of the stocks in case the person has been engaged in the business for at least three (3) months; otherwise, it shall be reckoned from the time he started his business.

XXXXX

 

    Quote “SECTION 15.    Penalty for Acts of Illegal Price Manipulation. — Any person who commits any act of illegal price manipulation of any basic necessity or prime commodity under Section 5 hereof shall suffer the penalty of imprisonment for a period of not less than five (5) years nor more than Fifteen (15) years, and shall be imposed a fine of not less than Five thousand pesos (P5,000) nor more than Two million pesos (P2,000,000)

_0_0_0_0

      Quote “Rules of Court. Rule 112. Sec. 7. When accused lawfully arrested without warrant. – When a person is lawfully arrested without a warrant involving an offense which requires a preliminary investigation, the complaint or information may be filed by a prosecutor without need of such investigation provided an inquest has been conducted in accordance with existing rules. In the absence or unavailability of an inquest prosecutor, the complaint may be filed by the offended party or a peace officer directly with the proper court on the basis of the affidavit of the offended party or arresting officer or person.

             Quote “Before the complaint or information is filed, the person arrested may ask for a preliminary investigation in accordance with this Rule, but he must sign a waiver of the provision of Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, in the presence of his counsel. Notwithstanding the waiver, he may apply for bail and the investigation must be terminated within fifteen (15) days from its inception.

            Quote “After the filing of the complaint or information in court without a preliminary investigation, the accused may, within five (5) days from the time he learns of its filing, ask for a preliminary investigation with the same right to adduce evidence in his defense  as provided in this Rule.” Closed-quote.