Pardon of 9 Magdalo soldiers: Writing the terms

Artwork by Andy Warhol. Gun. 1981-82. Used here for  educational, non-commercial purposes, free service by blog-use of image provided by and from www.allposters.com

        The order granting pardon to the nine  Magdalo soldiers who have earlier entered a plea of guilt  to the crime of coup d ‘etat,   has not been written. This time, it is hoped that in order to obviate any ambiguity, the conditional pardon  be written in the language of the Revised Penal Code.  Interpretation of ambiguities are left entirely to the unilateral interpretation of the pardoning authority. Additional conditions should be clear enough: what rights are withheld; what acts would constitute a violation. Of course, the pardoning authority can add,  at the tailend of each clause,  the usual catch-all phrases. That  is  its prerogative. That is the leash. For those espousing what they consider lofty ideals, or who had been misled that they were pursuing noble purposes (depending on how you look at that military adventurism)  and convicted of a political crime: the price of accepting pardon from this incumbent,  is dignity, it is what she exacts if you are not a  rich and powerful convicted personality. In this country, convicted plunderers and rapists are treated far better than rebels. That is the real message. The rebel-prisoner cannot be blamed; a person who is caged like an animal  cannot make any choices but freedom.

 

        Here’s the language of the Revised Penal Code on pardon:

 

Article 36. Pardon; its effect. – A pardon shall not work the restoration of the right to hold public office, or the right of suffrage, unless such rights be expressly restored by the terms of the pardon.

A pardon shall in no case exempt the culprit from the payment of the civil indemnity imposed upon him by the sentence.

 

XXXXX

Article 94. Partial Extinction of criminal liability. – Criminal liability is extinguished partially:

1. By conditional pardon;

XXXX

 

Article 95. Obligation incurred by person granted conditional pardon. – Any person who has been granted conditional pardon shall incur the obligation of complying strictly with the conditions imposed therein; otherwise, his non-compliance with any of the conditions specified shall result in the revocation of the pardon and the provisions of article 159 shall be applied to him.

XXXXXX

        Article 159. Other cases of evasion of service of sentence. – The penalty of prision correccional in its minimum period shall be imposed upon the convict who, having been granted conditional pardon by the Chief Executive, shall violate any of the conditions of such pardon. However, if the penalty remitted by the granting of such pardon be higher than six years, the convict shall then suffer the unexpired portion of his original sentence.

 

 

 

      

 

The Start of the Meralco Saga (Manila Electric Company: electric power distributor)

Artwork by Gary Conner. Computer board with Flower. Used here for  educational, non-commercial purposes, free service by blog-use of image provided by and from www.allposters.com      

         “Bite me!” is what he would have said if he were Britney Spears.

     “Dude…. i am so not feeling you”  is what he would have said if he were Keanu Reeves.
       “Ikaw, sumusobra ka na, dapat ka ng kalusin…”  is what he would have said if he were FPJ.

         But with some restraint (napupuno na nagtitimpi!) the Lopez patriarch said, half-smiling : “If they want, they can buy us out…” ( Which is not really an offer to sell, the sense  is: “Buy me out if you can.”)

       To which the GSIS chair, who hold/ controls a third of the shares of Meralco said, okay, we’ll buy you out.

        Today, Winston Garcia is saying:  he plans to break up Meralco once the government takes over its management. He did not seem to be speaking hypothetically; at least that is the sense. “once” seems to be more intentional than “if”.  Can he put his money where his mouth is, or — to make it more applicable: Can he put his proxies and shares where his mouth is? We’ll know in less than two weeks.

     This intra-corporate struggle will proceed quite independently, quite separately, from the joint Senate-House legislative inquiry. The congressional inquiry is some sort of a “grilling” “in aid of legislation”.

          Legally, can he? (Break up Meralco into two or three)

        I’ll… be…. back! (using my “Terminator” robot voice)…. (Bitin! Sorry, may ginagawa ako.)

     But because i’m nice (ngek!), here is the Meralco legislative franchise, i researched it for you. See?  i’m nice, i did research; but with no legal opinion (ngek! E di ba, naka-embargo nga ako sa legal opinion dito sa blog). With terms and conditions, it’s  good until 2028;  with conditions. I’ll be back.

……….

 Downloaded from www.elibrary.supremecourt.gov.ph

 REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9209. June 09, 2003. AN ACT GRANTING THE MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY A FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF ELECTRIC POWER TO THE END-USERS IN THE CITIES/MUNICIPALITIES OF METRO MANILA, BULACAN, CAVITE AND RIZAL, AND CERTAIN CITIES/MUNICIPALITIES/BARANGAYS IN BATANGAS, LAGUNA, QUEZON AND PAMPANGA

 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress assembled: SECTION 1. Nature and Scope of Franchise. – Subject to the provisions of the Constitution and applicable laws, rules and regulation, there is hereby granted to Manila Electric Company (MERALCO), hereunder referred to as the grantee, its successors or assigns, a franchise to construct, operate and maintain in the public interest and commercial purposes, a distribution system for the conveyance of electric power to the end-users in the cities and municipalities of Caloocan, Las Pinas, Makati, Malabon, Mandaluyong, Manila, Marikina, Muntinlupa, Navotas, Parañaque, Pasay, Pasig, Pateros, Quezon City, San Juan, Taguig and Valenzuela of Metro Manila; cities and municipalities of Angat, Balagtas, Baliuag, Bocaue, Bulacan, Bustos, Calumpit, Doña R. Trinidad, Guiguinto. Hagonoy, Malolos, Marilao, Meycauayan, Norzagaray, Obando, Pandi, Paombong, Plaridel, Pulilan, San Ildefonso, San Jose del Monte, San Miguel, San Rafael and Sta. Maria, Province of Bulacan; cities and municipalities of Alfonso, Amadeo, Bacoor, Carmona, Cavite, Dasmarinas, Gen. Alvarez, Gen. E. Aguinaldo, Gen Trias, Imus, Indang, Kawit, Magallanes, Maragondon, Mendez Nuñez, Naic, Noveleta, Rosario, Silang, Tagaytay, Tanza, Ternate and Trece Martires, Province of Cavite, cities and municipalities of Angono, Antipolo, Baras, Binangonan, Cainta, Cardona, Jala-Jala, Montalban, Morong, Pililla, San Mateo, Tanay, Taytay and Teresa, Province of Rizal; cities and municipalities of Alaminos, bay, Biñan, Cabuyao, Calamba, Calauan, Liliw, Los Baños, Luisiana, Magdalena, Majayjay, Nagcarlan, Pila, Rosa and Victoria, Province of Laguna; cities and municipalities of Candelaria, Dolores, San Antonio, Sariaya, Tayabas and Tiaong, Province of Quezon; barangays of Balucuc and Concepcion in San Simon, Pampanga; and Barangays of Bahay Pare, Barangca, Dulong Ilog, Mangumbali, Mandili, Mapaniqui, Paligui, Pangclara, Pulong Gubat, Pulong Palazan, Salapungan, Vizal San Pablo, Vizal Santo Cristo and Vizal Sto. Nino in Candaba, Pampanga. As used in this Act, distribution system refers to the system of wires and associated facilities including sub-transmission lines belonging to a franchised distribution utility extending between the delivery point on the national transmission system or generating facility and the metering point/facility of the end-user. SEC. 2. Manner of Operations of Facilities. – All electric distribution facilities, lines, and systems for electric services owned, maintained, operated or managed by the grantee, its successors or assigns shall be operated and maintained at all times in a superior manner, and it shall be the duty of the grantee, its successors or assigns, whenever required to do so by the Energy Regulatory Commission, hereafter referred to as the ERC, or its legal successor, to modify, improve and change such facilities or systems in such manner and to such extent as the progress in science and improvement in the electric power services may render reasonable and proper. Whenever practicable and for purposes of maintaining order, safety and aesthetics along the highways, roads, streets, alleys or right-of-way, the grantee may allow the use of free spaces in its poles, facilities or right-of-way by interested parties upon reasonable compensation to the grantee considering costs incurred to accommodate and administer the use of the grantee’s facilities by such parties. The ERC shall decide in case of dispute or disagreement between the parties. SEC. 3. Ingress and Egress. – For the purpose of erecting and maintaining poles and other supports for said facilities, wires or other conductors or for the purpose of laying and maintaining poles and other supports for said facilities, wires or other conductors or for the purpose of laying and maintaining said facilities, wires, cables, or other conductors, it shall be lawful for the grantee, its successors and assigns, with the prior approval of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) or the local government units (LGUs) concerned, as may be appropriate, to make excavations or lay conduits in any of the public places, highways, streets, lanes, alleys, avenues, sidewalk or bridges of said provinces: Provided, however, That any public place, highways, street, lane, avenue, sidewalk or bridge disturbed, altered or changed by reason of the erection of poles or other supports, or the laying of wires, other conductors or conduits, shall be immediately repaired and properly restored at the expense of the grantee, its successors and assigns, in accordance with the standards set by the DPWH and concerned LGUs. SEC. 4. Responsibility to the Public. – The grantee shall supply electricity to its captive market in the least cost manner. In the interest of the public good and as far as feasible and whenever required by the ERC, the grantee shall modify, improve or change its facilities, poles, lines, systems and equipment for the purpose of providing efficient and reliable service and reduced electricity costs. The grantee shall charge reasonable, just and competitive power rates for its services to all types of consumers within its franchised area in order that business and industries shall be able to compete. The grantee shall have the obligation to provide open and nondiscriminatory access to its distribution system and services for any end-user within its franchise area consistent with Republic Act No. 9136, otherwise known as the “Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001.” The grantee shall not engage in any activity that will constitute an abuse of market power such as but not limited to, unfair trade practices, monopolistic schemes and any other activities that will hinder competitiveness or business and industries. SEC. 5. Rates for Services. – The retail rates to its captive market and charges for the distribution of electric power by the grantee to its end-users shall be regulated by and subject to the approval of the ERC. The grantee shall identify and segregate in its bill to the end-users the components of the retail rate pursuant to Republic Act No. 9136, unless otherwise amended. Such rates charged by the grantee to the end-users shall be made public and transparent. The grantee shall implement lifeline rate to marginalized end-users as mandated under Republic Act No. 9136. SEC. 6. Promotion of Consumer Interests. – The herein grantee shall establish a consumer desks that will handle consumer complaints and ensure adequate promotion of consumer interest. The grantee shall act with dispatch on all complaints brought before it. SEC. 7. Right of the Government. – A special right is hereby reserved to the President of the Philippines in times of war, rebellion, public peril, calamity, emergency, disaster or disturbance of peace and order to take over and operate the distribution system of the grantee or to authorize the temporary use and operation thereof by any agency/department of the government upon due compensation to the grantee for the use of the said distribution system during the period when they shall be operated. SEC. 8. Right of Eminent Domain. – Subject to the limitations and procedures prescribed by law, the grantee is authorized to exercise the right of eminent domain insofar as it may be reasonably necessary for the efficient maintenance and operation of services. The grantee is authorized to install and maintain its poles, wires and other facilities over and across public property, including streets, highways, forest reserves and other similar property of the government of the Philippines, its branches or any of its instrumentalities. The grantee may acquire such private property as is actually necessary for the realization of the purposes for which this is granted: Provided, That proper condemnation proceedings shall have been instituted and just compensation paid. SEC. 9. Term of Franchise. – This franchise shall be for a term of twenty-five (25) years from the date of effectivity of this Act, unless sooner revoked or cancelled by Congress for any violation of the terms and/or provisions of the franchise herein granted. SEC. 10. Acceptance and Compliance. – Acceptance of this franchise shall be given in writing within sixty (60) days after the effectivity of this Act. SEC. 11. Warranty in Favor of National and Local Government. – The grantee shall hold the national, provincial and municipal governments of the Philippines harmless from all claims, accounts, demands or actions arising out of accidents or injuries, whether to property or persons, caused by the construction, installation, operation and maintenance of the distribution system of the grantee. SEC. 12. Liability for Damages. – The grantee shall be liable for any injury and damage arising from or caused by accident to persons and property by reason of any defective construction under this franchise or of any neglect or omission to keep its poles and wires in a safe condition. SEC. 13. Sale, Lease, Transfer, Usufruct, Etc. – The grantee shall not lease, transfer, grant the usufruct of or sell this franchise or the rights and privileges acquired thereunder to any person, firm, company corporation or other commercial or legal entity, nor merge with any other corporation or entity, nor shall the controlling interest of the grantee be transferred whether in whole or in part, and whether simultaneously or contemporaneously, to any such person, firm, company corporation or entity without the prior approval of the Congress of the Philippines, except to a wholly-owned subsidiary of the grantee or where the grantee is the surviving corporation: Provided, That any such transfer, sale or assignment is in accordance with the constitutional limitations. Any person or entity to which this franchise is sold, transferred or assigned shall be subject to the same conditions, terms, restrictions and limitations of this Act. SEC. 14. Reportorial Requirement. – The grantee shall submit an annual report of finances and operations to the Congress of the Philippines. SEC. 15. Equality Clause. – In the event that any competing individual, partnership or corporation shall receive a similar permit or franchise with terms and/or provisions more favorable than those herein granted or which tend to place the herein grantee at any disadvantage, such terms and/or provisions shall be deemed part hereof and shall operate equally in favor of the herein grantees: Provided, however, That the foregoing shall neither apply to nor affect the provisions concerning territory covered by the franchise and the life-span of the franchise. SEC. 16. Applicability Clause. – The grantee shall comply with and be subject to the provisions of Commonwealth Act No. 146, as amended, otherwise known as the “Public Services Act” and Republic Act No. 9136. SEC. 17. Repealability and Nonexclusivity Clause. – This franchise shall be subject to amendment, alteration or repeal by the Congress of the Philippines when the public interest so requires and shall not be interpreted as an exclusive grant of the privileges herein provided for. SEC. 18. Separability Clause. – If for any reason, any of the sections or provisions of this Act is declared unconstitutional or invalid, the other parts or provisions hereof which are not affected thereby shall continue to be in full force and effect. SEC. 19. Repealing Clause. – Acts 484 and 3648, as amended, Republic Act No. 3444 and all other laws, decrees, orders, resolutions, instructions and rules and regulations or parts thereof, which are consistent herewith, are hereby deemed repealed or modified accordingly. SEC. 20. Effectivity. – This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days from the date of its publication, upon the initiative of the grantee, in at least two (2) newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines.

Approved,

 (Sgd.) FRANKLIN M. DRILON  (Sgd.) JOSE DE VENECIA JR. 

President of the Senate Speaker of the House of Representatives 

 This Act which originated in the House of Representatives was finally passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on March 13, 2002 and March 20, 2003, respectively.

 (Sgd.) OSCAR G. YABES (Sgd.) ROBERTO P. NAZARENO Secretary of the Senate Secretary General

House of Representatives Approved: June 9, 2003

 (Sgd.) GLORIA MACAPAGAL – ARROYO President of the Philippines

 E-Library Doc. ID: 495c47d31eb685c294f8fc14a4a58c82455a4297c0da4

 

“That in so strange a time…. Common integrity could look like courage”

 

  Painting by Diego Rivera. Peasants. Used here for  educational, non-commercial purposes, free service by blog-use of image provided by and from www.allposters.com

        

           quote “Lawyers, Jails, and the Law’s Fake Bargains” by Michael Tigar, July-August 2001 issue of Monthly Review at     http://www.monthlyreview.org/0701tigar.htm

(FINAL excerpts (third and final installment)  of a 15-page article by Michael Tigar; excerpted by this blog)

    (Michael Tigar is an American University Washington College of  Law Professor  (Constitutional Law; Supreme Court; French legal system; criminal law and procedure; human rights); one of the most renowned lawyers in the United States;  has argued seven cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and more than 100 appellate cases; written extensively about litigation, aspects of trial practice, criminal law, the death penalty, and the role of the criminal  defense lawyer. His books include Fighting Injustice (ABA, 2002); Federal Appeals: Jurisdiction and Practice; and Examining Witnesses;  has been active in pro bono cases, the American Bar Association, continuing legal education programs, and international human rights. During the apartheid period, he went to South Africa to train black lawyers. Prior to joining AU, Tigar served as a professor at the University of Texas Law School)

       Quote “xxxx  People of color are under-represented in the ranks of lawyers, and only in the past twenty years have any significant number of Chicano lawyers entered the profession, when entry is measured in percentage of the Chicano population. Once in the legal profession, people of color tend to be relegated to its lowest rungs and face race-based obstacles to advancement. One ticket to advancement is to abandon the cause of racial justice. Law school programs designed to redress historic inequality are increasingly under attack.

          XXXX

      Quote “It is a wonder that there is much challenge at all to the system this issue describes, yet there are challenges. xxxx   In Law and the Rise of Capitalism, reissued in a new edition in 2000, I discussed the role and importance of these lawyers. They do not stand at the center of events, but they assist those who are at the center or who are brought into conflict with the state. Lawyers help to turn claims for justice into coherent demands and principles. They may show the open spaces within an old system, where change can be successful. When the open spaces close up, they can help define the conditions on which a new order will be created.

       Quote “Some question my picture of lawyers’ potential role. Yet in struggle after struggle, fighters for justice have drawn on legal ideology. Nelson Mandela and Oliver Tambo were lawyers, and their continued calls for justice were phrased in terms of the legal ideology that would emerge in a transformed South Africa.

       Quote “Honorable public defenders and appointed counsel, of whom there are many, fight the system one battle at a time. We salute them, while remembering Yevgeny Yevtushenko’s words:

 

How sharply our children will be ashamed

Taking at last their vengeance for these horrors

That in so strange a time

Common integrity could look like courage

      Quote “In some law schools, such as Washington College of Law, American University, where I teach, clinical legal education helps to prepare lawyers to meet the challenges that this system poses. Nationally, however, only about 3 percent of law graduates go into public interest law, compared with some 15 percent twenty-five years ago. At WCL, we manage to place about three times the national average in such jobs. But restrictions on funding for defender services, state and federal, have seriously eroded the job opportunities in that sector. Meanwhile, the law graduate who goes into public interest work will earn less than 20 percent of what a graduate who enters private practice can expect. Twenty-five years ago, the disparity was much less—about half. Concerned law students should join up with such progressive organizations as the National Lawyers Guild.

      Quote “However, human rights organizations have creatively attacked the system’s unfairness by class action lawsuits that further the demands of many defendants and target entire jail or prosecutorial systems. XXXXX

       Quote “The large-scale class action is significant for the same reason that civil rights litigation of the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s played a constructive role. Given the real world of conservative judges, this kind of litigation faces significant obstacles to courtroom success. Like much class suit litigation, however, the lawsuit can serve as a means to focus public attention on issues. It can and should be part of a broader organizing effort. In this arena as in others, the community’s demands and needs, and not the lawyer’s view of the world, have pride of place.

 

Quote “SOURCES

Quote “1)Angela Jordan Davis, The American Prosecutor: Independence, Power and the Threat of Tyranny, 86 Iowa L. Rev. 393 (2001) contains many useful citations. 2)The Supreme Court case on lawyer speech is Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S. 1030 (1991). It must be noted, however, that the Court did reverse the disciplinary action against Mr. Gentile on first amendment grounds, while a separate majority of the Court set a standard for future cases.3)The case limiting the appointed lawyer’s representation to the specific case is Texas v. Cobb, No. 99-1702 (April 2, 2001). 4)The study of death penalty counsel is part of a superb Symposium, Carter Center Symposium on the Death Penalty, 14 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 329 (1998). 5)Ineffective assistance of counsel cases include Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).6)On waiver of rights, see Michael E. Tigar, Foreword: Waiver of Constitutional Rights: Disquiet in the Citadel, 84 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (1970). 7)The New York Times articles ran April 8-10, 2001, and are on the Times website at  

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/08/nyregion/08LAWY.html;

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/09/nyregion/09LEGA.html;

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/10/nyregion/10LAWY.html.

 

Quote “8)The Mississippi case is Neal v. Puckett, 2001 WL 43274 (5th Cir. 2001).” Closed-quote.