ABS-CBN Franchise Hearings: Gerry Baja of Teleradyo whips up a lively incisive interview. File from last week

ABS-CBN Franchise Hearings:

Gerry Baja of Teleradyo whips up a lively incisive interview.

File from last week (June 30)

                         Notes:

      When a quasi-judicial agency … (quasi-judicial agencies are parts of the Executive Branch that adjudicate rights and privileges of parties affected by their functions) when a quasi-judicial agency renders a decision adverse to a party, the party adversely affected may normally appeal such decision with the Office of the President (quasi-judicial agencies are parts of the executive branch) or… if circumstances show that such an appeal to the Office of the President would be futile, an APPEAL   from a decision of the quasi-judicial agency may be filed with the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court.

       Where there is a violation of a CLEAR LEGAL RIGHT, such as for example, a violation of any of your rights under the Bill of Rights, the remedy is to file a special civil action (an example is a petition for certiorari and prohibition with application for a preliminary injunction and TRO): For this, the following have jurisdiction: The Regional Trial Court (if the agency is located within its territorial jurisdiction) or the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court. In other words, any of the regular courts from the RTC to the CA to the SC has jurisdiction and can issue TROs against any agency (for the RTC, if within its territorial jurisdiction).

     So, appeals, and special civil actions, are different from each other —    we leave it to the handling lawyers of the ABS-CBN case to strategize, they know best (i never second-guess colleagues in the profession handling a specific case). Sorry for the lawyer talk.

     During one of the franchise hearings last week, there was an allegation from one of the congressmen that AMCARA (which has its own franchise ) was a dummy of ABS-CBN supposedly because it has its office on the Scout Esguerra-Mother-Ignacia compound and it does not have its own giant transmitter.
Check it out: That compound and the one in Rockwell have dozens and dozens of tenants: Coffeeshops, call center hubs, clothes retail stores, canteen concessionaires , etc. Are tenants dummies of the space-owners they are leasing? Tell me.

      Many franchise holders also do not have their own transmitters and are just renting other people’s transmitters. Are lessees of equipment, dummies of their lessors? Tell me.

    A dummy means the corporation or person has assigned its/his/her interests, or the ownership of the company, to its principal…

      the principal or the dummer ( 😊 i just made up the word dummer…dummee)
In Fraport (a German company) vs. Philippines, the party Philippines was able to show that several deeds of assignment had been issued by Filipino shareholders in favor of Fraport assigning their interests to Fraport (making said Filipino shareholders, dummies of Fraport, a German company).

      If you want to show dummyhood, you must show that the owners are not the real owners or that they have assigned their interests.

        (From the files, last week’s interview, June 30,  a few hours after the NTC Commissioner said it was mulling an “alias” CDO against ABS-CBN, in the style of an alias warrant of arrest or alias summons. (an alias warrant of arrest or alias summons is issued by the judge when the original arrest warrant or summons was never served.)

     The next day, the NTC did issue an order to stop the TV Plus channels on AMCARA frequency — typing the word “ORDER” in big letters , then they put a small parenthesis with small letters …

                  “Alias Order”.  


Nahiya nang konti kaya naka-parenthesis and in  small font.

       I’m off to work… i’m off-cuffing…
From the files… The theme song used to intro the program and the interview was “Stayin’ Alive” by the Bee Gees…

    June 30 Interview, before NTC  summarily, without a hearing,  CDO’ed  or stopped ABS-CBN from airing its TV Plus  programs on Amcara frequency (Amcara, holding the Amcara frequency, is not bound by that CDO. NTC further has no contempt powers. Wala po siyang contempt powers, wala po).

The Start of the Meralco Saga (Manila Electric Company: electric power distributor)

Artwork by Gary Conner. Computer board with Flower. Used here for  educational, non-commercial purposes, free service by blog-use of image provided by and from www.allposters.com      

         “Bite me!” is what he would have said if he were Britney Spears.

     “Dude…. i am so not feeling you”  is what he would have said if he were Keanu Reeves.
       “Ikaw, sumusobra ka na, dapat ka ng kalusin…”  is what he would have said if he were FPJ.

         But with some restraint (napupuno na nagtitimpi!) the Lopez patriarch said, half-smiling : “If they want, they can buy us out…” ( Which is not really an offer to sell, the sense  is: “Buy me out if you can.”)

       To which the GSIS chair, who hold/ controls a third of the shares of Meralco said, okay, we’ll buy you out.

        Today, Winston Garcia is saying:  he plans to break up Meralco once the government takes over its management. He did not seem to be speaking hypothetically; at least that is the sense. “once” seems to be more intentional than “if”.  Can he put his money where his mouth is, or — to make it more applicable: Can he put his proxies and shares where his mouth is? We’ll know in less than two weeks.

     This intra-corporate struggle will proceed quite independently, quite separately, from the joint Senate-House legislative inquiry. The congressional inquiry is some sort of a “grilling” “in aid of legislation”.

          Legally, can he? (Break up Meralco into two or three)

        I’ll… be…. back! (using my “Terminator” robot voice)…. (Bitin! Sorry, may ginagawa ako.)

     But because i’m nice (ngek!), here is the Meralco legislative franchise, i researched it for you. See?  i’m nice, i did research; but with no legal opinion (ngek! E di ba, naka-embargo nga ako sa legal opinion dito sa blog). With terms and conditions, it’s  good until 2028;  with conditions. I’ll be back.

……….

 Downloaded from www.elibrary.supremecourt.gov.ph

 REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9209. June 09, 2003. AN ACT GRANTING THE MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY A FRANCHISE TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN A DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF ELECTRIC POWER TO THE END-USERS IN THE CITIES/MUNICIPALITIES OF METRO MANILA, BULACAN, CAVITE AND RIZAL, AND CERTAIN CITIES/MUNICIPALITIES/BARANGAYS IN BATANGAS, LAGUNA, QUEZON AND PAMPANGA

 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress assembled: SECTION 1. Nature and Scope of Franchise. – Subject to the provisions of the Constitution and applicable laws, rules and regulation, there is hereby granted to Manila Electric Company (MERALCO), hereunder referred to as the grantee, its successors or assigns, a franchise to construct, operate and maintain in the public interest and commercial purposes, a distribution system for the conveyance of electric power to the end-users in the cities and municipalities of Caloocan, Las Pinas, Makati, Malabon, Mandaluyong, Manila, Marikina, Muntinlupa, Navotas, Parañaque, Pasay, Pasig, Pateros, Quezon City, San Juan, Taguig and Valenzuela of Metro Manila; cities and municipalities of Angat, Balagtas, Baliuag, Bocaue, Bulacan, Bustos, Calumpit, Doña R. Trinidad, Guiguinto. Hagonoy, Malolos, Marilao, Meycauayan, Norzagaray, Obando, Pandi, Paombong, Plaridel, Pulilan, San Ildefonso, San Jose del Monte, San Miguel, San Rafael and Sta. Maria, Province of Bulacan; cities and municipalities of Alfonso, Amadeo, Bacoor, Carmona, Cavite, Dasmarinas, Gen. Alvarez, Gen. E. Aguinaldo, Gen Trias, Imus, Indang, Kawit, Magallanes, Maragondon, Mendez Nuñez, Naic, Noveleta, Rosario, Silang, Tagaytay, Tanza, Ternate and Trece Martires, Province of Cavite, cities and municipalities of Angono, Antipolo, Baras, Binangonan, Cainta, Cardona, Jala-Jala, Montalban, Morong, Pililla, San Mateo, Tanay, Taytay and Teresa, Province of Rizal; cities and municipalities of Alaminos, bay, Biñan, Cabuyao, Calamba, Calauan, Liliw, Los Baños, Luisiana, Magdalena, Majayjay, Nagcarlan, Pila, Rosa and Victoria, Province of Laguna; cities and municipalities of Candelaria, Dolores, San Antonio, Sariaya, Tayabas and Tiaong, Province of Quezon; barangays of Balucuc and Concepcion in San Simon, Pampanga; and Barangays of Bahay Pare, Barangca, Dulong Ilog, Mangumbali, Mandili, Mapaniqui, Paligui, Pangclara, Pulong Gubat, Pulong Palazan, Salapungan, Vizal San Pablo, Vizal Santo Cristo and Vizal Sto. Nino in Candaba, Pampanga. As used in this Act, distribution system refers to the system of wires and associated facilities including sub-transmission lines belonging to a franchised distribution utility extending between the delivery point on the national transmission system or generating facility and the metering point/facility of the end-user. SEC. 2. Manner of Operations of Facilities. – All electric distribution facilities, lines, and systems for electric services owned, maintained, operated or managed by the grantee, its successors or assigns shall be operated and maintained at all times in a superior manner, and it shall be the duty of the grantee, its successors or assigns, whenever required to do so by the Energy Regulatory Commission, hereafter referred to as the ERC, or its legal successor, to modify, improve and change such facilities or systems in such manner and to such extent as the progress in science and improvement in the electric power services may render reasonable and proper. Whenever practicable and for purposes of maintaining order, safety and aesthetics along the highways, roads, streets, alleys or right-of-way, the grantee may allow the use of free spaces in its poles, facilities or right-of-way by interested parties upon reasonable compensation to the grantee considering costs incurred to accommodate and administer the use of the grantee’s facilities by such parties. The ERC shall decide in case of dispute or disagreement between the parties. SEC. 3. Ingress and Egress. – For the purpose of erecting and maintaining poles and other supports for said facilities, wires or other conductors or for the purpose of laying and maintaining poles and other supports for said facilities, wires or other conductors or for the purpose of laying and maintaining said facilities, wires, cables, or other conductors, it shall be lawful for the grantee, its successors and assigns, with the prior approval of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) or the local government units (LGUs) concerned, as may be appropriate, to make excavations or lay conduits in any of the public places, highways, streets, lanes, alleys, avenues, sidewalk or bridges of said provinces: Provided, however, That any public place, highways, street, lane, avenue, sidewalk or bridge disturbed, altered or changed by reason of the erection of poles or other supports, or the laying of wires, other conductors or conduits, shall be immediately repaired and properly restored at the expense of the grantee, its successors and assigns, in accordance with the standards set by the DPWH and concerned LGUs. SEC. 4. Responsibility to the Public. – The grantee shall supply electricity to its captive market in the least cost manner. In the interest of the public good and as far as feasible and whenever required by the ERC, the grantee shall modify, improve or change its facilities, poles, lines, systems and equipment for the purpose of providing efficient and reliable service and reduced electricity costs. The grantee shall charge reasonable, just and competitive power rates for its services to all types of consumers within its franchised area in order that business and industries shall be able to compete. The grantee shall have the obligation to provide open and nondiscriminatory access to its distribution system and services for any end-user within its franchise area consistent with Republic Act No. 9136, otherwise known as the “Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001.” The grantee shall not engage in any activity that will constitute an abuse of market power such as but not limited to, unfair trade practices, monopolistic schemes and any other activities that will hinder competitiveness or business and industries. SEC. 5. Rates for Services. – The retail rates to its captive market and charges for the distribution of electric power by the grantee to its end-users shall be regulated by and subject to the approval of the ERC. The grantee shall identify and segregate in its bill to the end-users the components of the retail rate pursuant to Republic Act No. 9136, unless otherwise amended. Such rates charged by the grantee to the end-users shall be made public and transparent. The grantee shall implement lifeline rate to marginalized end-users as mandated under Republic Act No. 9136. SEC. 6. Promotion of Consumer Interests. – The herein grantee shall establish a consumer desks that will handle consumer complaints and ensure adequate promotion of consumer interest. The grantee shall act with dispatch on all complaints brought before it. SEC. 7. Right of the Government. – A special right is hereby reserved to the President of the Philippines in times of war, rebellion, public peril, calamity, emergency, disaster or disturbance of peace and order to take over and operate the distribution system of the grantee or to authorize the temporary use and operation thereof by any agency/department of the government upon due compensation to the grantee for the use of the said distribution system during the period when they shall be operated. SEC. 8. Right of Eminent Domain. – Subject to the limitations and procedures prescribed by law, the grantee is authorized to exercise the right of eminent domain insofar as it may be reasonably necessary for the efficient maintenance and operation of services. The grantee is authorized to install and maintain its poles, wires and other facilities over and across public property, including streets, highways, forest reserves and other similar property of the government of the Philippines, its branches or any of its instrumentalities. The grantee may acquire such private property as is actually necessary for the realization of the purposes for which this is granted: Provided, That proper condemnation proceedings shall have been instituted and just compensation paid. SEC. 9. Term of Franchise. – This franchise shall be for a term of twenty-five (25) years from the date of effectivity of this Act, unless sooner revoked or cancelled by Congress for any violation of the terms and/or provisions of the franchise herein granted. SEC. 10. Acceptance and Compliance. – Acceptance of this franchise shall be given in writing within sixty (60) days after the effectivity of this Act. SEC. 11. Warranty in Favor of National and Local Government. – The grantee shall hold the national, provincial and municipal governments of the Philippines harmless from all claims, accounts, demands or actions arising out of accidents or injuries, whether to property or persons, caused by the construction, installation, operation and maintenance of the distribution system of the grantee. SEC. 12. Liability for Damages. – The grantee shall be liable for any injury and damage arising from or caused by accident to persons and property by reason of any defective construction under this franchise or of any neglect or omission to keep its poles and wires in a safe condition. SEC. 13. Sale, Lease, Transfer, Usufruct, Etc. – The grantee shall not lease, transfer, grant the usufruct of or sell this franchise or the rights and privileges acquired thereunder to any person, firm, company corporation or other commercial or legal entity, nor merge with any other corporation or entity, nor shall the controlling interest of the grantee be transferred whether in whole or in part, and whether simultaneously or contemporaneously, to any such person, firm, company corporation or entity without the prior approval of the Congress of the Philippines, except to a wholly-owned subsidiary of the grantee or where the grantee is the surviving corporation: Provided, That any such transfer, sale or assignment is in accordance with the constitutional limitations. Any person or entity to which this franchise is sold, transferred or assigned shall be subject to the same conditions, terms, restrictions and limitations of this Act. SEC. 14. Reportorial Requirement. – The grantee shall submit an annual report of finances and operations to the Congress of the Philippines. SEC. 15. Equality Clause. – In the event that any competing individual, partnership or corporation shall receive a similar permit or franchise with terms and/or provisions more favorable than those herein granted or which tend to place the herein grantee at any disadvantage, such terms and/or provisions shall be deemed part hereof and shall operate equally in favor of the herein grantees: Provided, however, That the foregoing shall neither apply to nor affect the provisions concerning territory covered by the franchise and the life-span of the franchise. SEC. 16. Applicability Clause. – The grantee shall comply with and be subject to the provisions of Commonwealth Act No. 146, as amended, otherwise known as the “Public Services Act” and Republic Act No. 9136. SEC. 17. Repealability and Nonexclusivity Clause. – This franchise shall be subject to amendment, alteration or repeal by the Congress of the Philippines when the public interest so requires and shall not be interpreted as an exclusive grant of the privileges herein provided for. SEC. 18. Separability Clause. – If for any reason, any of the sections or provisions of this Act is declared unconstitutional or invalid, the other parts or provisions hereof which are not affected thereby shall continue to be in full force and effect. SEC. 19. Repealing Clause. – Acts 484 and 3648, as amended, Republic Act No. 3444 and all other laws, decrees, orders, resolutions, instructions and rules and regulations or parts thereof, which are consistent herewith, are hereby deemed repealed or modified accordingly. SEC. 20. Effectivity. – This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days from the date of its publication, upon the initiative of the grantee, in at least two (2) newspaper of general circulation in the Philippines.

Approved,

 (Sgd.) FRANKLIN M. DRILON  (Sgd.) JOSE DE VENECIA JR. 

President of the Senate Speaker of the House of Representatives 

 This Act which originated in the House of Representatives was finally passed by the House of Representatives and the Senate on March 13, 2002 and March 20, 2003, respectively.

 (Sgd.) OSCAR G. YABES (Sgd.) ROBERTO P. NAZARENO Secretary of the Senate Secretary General

House of Representatives Approved: June 9, 2003

 (Sgd.) GLORIA MACAPAGAL – ARROYO President of the Philippines

 E-Library Doc. ID: 495c47d31eb685c294f8fc14a4a58c82455a4297c0da4

 

Are you a stockholder of MERALCO (Manila Electric Company)? : Proxy War 101

Painting by Wassily Kandinsky. Dominant Curve. 1936. Used here for  educational, non-commercial purposes, free service by blog-use of image provided by and from www.allposters.com

      

         For the annual stockholders’ meeting of Meralco on May 27, 2008, for which GSIS chair and board director Winston Garcia has threatened to vote out the present management (change or take over management) on behalf of Gloria, este, the government, following is the provision and annotation on the anticipated proxy war:   

     Quote “Corpo Code. Section 58. Proxies. – Stockholders and members may vote in person or by proxy in all meetings of stockholders or members. Proxies shall be in writing, signed by the stockholder or member and filed before the scheduled meeting with the corporate secretary. Unless otherwise provided in the proxy, it shall be valid only for the meeting for which it is intended. No proxy shall be valid and effective for a period longer than five (5) years at any one time. “ closed-quote.

         JOSE C. CAMPOS JR. & MARIA CLARA LOPEZ-CAMPOS, The Corporation Code, Comments, Notes, and Cases: Quote “Although a proxy mat be used in any kind of corporation, as a device of control, it is most used in widely held corporations. A stockholders meeting requires the presence of stockholders representing at least a majority of the outstanding capital stock. In a widely held corporation, where there are numerous stockholders, many of whom may be residing in places far from the principal office of the corporation, it will oftentimes be difficult to obtain the necessary quorum, unless the stockholders who cannot or do not care to attend give a proxy to another to attend on his behalf. This has given rise to the practice of the incumbent management group of large corporations to solicit proxies of their stockholders. Oftentimes, even stockholders who can easily attend annual meetings are indifferent to matters of management and are mainly interested in getting dividends from their investment. Thus, as long as they are satisfied with the returns of their investment, their indifference to matters of management will either result in their signing the solicited proxy or ignoring it completely – and in either case, they will in effect perpetuate the existing control. What the management of a widely held corporation usually  does is to send a proxy form together with the notice of the annual stockholders’ meeting. The persons suggested as proxies, sometimes referred to as the “proxy committee”, are persons selected by the incumbent directors. In this way, the existing management who may own only a small portion of the corporation’s shares, can retain its control over corporate affairs for as long as they can obtain the necessary number of proxies from absentee stockholders.

   XXXXX

      Quote “(A) group of stockholders xxx may seek control xxx by soliciting proxies for the next election of directors. This may result in a proxy contest between this group and the management group. These proxy fights can become bitter, long-drawn, and very expensive. Each block will seek the proxies of absentee stockholders who are not identified with any group. The management block, usually is in a more favourable  position because it can as a rule use corporate funds and facilities in its solicitation, as long as the expenses are reasonable under the circumstances and the proxy contest is not a purely personal one  (Rosenfeld vs. Fairchild Engine, 309 NY 168). On the other hand, there are conflicting views as to whether the other group would be entitled to reimbursement of even reasonable expenses in their solicitation (Ibid), although there is a strong view in favour of reimbursing reasonable expenses of an opposition group, if they succeed in electing their candidates as directors.” Closed-quote.