2ND OF FOUR PARTS
(excerpted, quoted verbatim; unedited: grammatical errors have not been corrected. For substance, the authors got points except as otherwise stated under “notes” for the student.)
(blog admin’s note on the first post below, same caveat as the previous one: There is a continuing debate on whether or not children or minors who have been killed should be named in news stories, being news subjects. Some news editors argue that since they are deceased, the restraint should be relaxed. That debate has not been resolved)
(blog admin’s note on the fifth post: There is a continuing debate on whether subjects of rape-murders could be named. Some news editors argue that since they are deceased, the restraint should be relaxed. I don’t agree with this – but there it is.)
Media monitor by domguamos.wordpress
“What happened with the four students of Bulacan State University (BSU) last August 20 was all over the news. As a matter of fact, three biggest news stations, GMA News, ABS-CBN News and News 5 had their own version of news coverage. With all that version, there is this one thing I noticed. All these stations revealed the students name. Based on the Philippine Press Institute Code of Ethics Article No. 8 which clearly states that one should exercise caution in publishing names of minors and women involved in criminal cases so that they may not unjustly lose their standing in the society. This case may not be a criminal rather a tragedy one but stating the victims’ name can still affect not only their reputation as well as their families. Not only the Code of Ethics has been violated but also rules implemented by the Commission on Higher Education.
“An alternative I can suggest is that they should have focus more on what really happened during the accident, the negligence in the part of the BSU officials as well as the tour guides during the field trip. As the news progresses each day, the three stations have included those information regarding what really went wrong in the field trip which in my opinion should have been on the first part of the story.
***********
By czarlinelene.wordpress
“Just this Sunday, Rappler released an article with the headline ‘Pinoy Archer Moreno wins Philippines first ever Olympic gold.’ At first glance, the subconscious mind would immediately establish that the Olympic indicated here is the Olympic main event that occurs during the summer and winter seasons of the year. It could have been a call for a nationwide, huge celebration, but this was not the case. As the headline gradually registers in the mind, the reality of the news report sinks in: it is not Olympic season yet so what is that clamor all about? It turns out, the Filipino archer clinched the medal in the Youth Olympic Games, a variation of the Olympic Games itself.
“Whether the writer used it to attract the readers or it was an honest mistake, it violates the first in the Code of Ethics: I shall scrupulously report and interpret the news, taking care not to suppress essential facts nor to distort the truth by omission or improper emphasis. I recognize the duty to air the other side and the duty to correct substantive errors promptly. The headline was a bit ambiguous, if not misleading. The fundamentals of newswriting teaches us that the headline must contain accurately the message of the article. In this case, there was improper emphasis on the specifics of the victory of the child, which led to the subtle distortion of the truth.”
************
Media Monitor (Aug 20-26) by Darien at darienbas.wordpress
“Tragedy struck on the 20th of August when news broke that seven students of the Bulacan State University perished in an unfortunate drowning accident during a field trip to Biak-na-Bato national park.
“….news channels … nonchalantly named the victims despite the fact that the people involved were minors.
“Under the Philippine Press Institute Code of Ethics Article number 8, sensitivity and caution has to be exercised when dealing with issues concerning women and minors and with the three major television networks in the country (ABS-CBN, GMA, TV5) naming the deceased, it is possible that the focus can be diverted from the story to the people affected, namely their families which can have a huge psychological effect and I highly doubt there was the consent of the families affected when they aired the names.
“Media practitioners should remember to uphold the Code of Ethics and also a degree of professionalism especially when covering sensitive issues like this one because in this case, it was the story that mattered, not the names of those involved.
“Whether the writer used it to attract the readers or it was an honest mistake, it violates the first in the Code of Ethics: I shall scrupulously report and interpret the news, taking care not to suppress essential facts nor to distort the truth by omission or improper emphasis. I recognize the duty to air the other side and the duty to correct substantive errors promptly. The headline was a bit ambiguous, if not misleading. The fundamentals of newswriting teaches us that the headline must contain accurately the message of the article. In this case, there was improper emphasis on the specifics of the victory of the child, which led to the subtle distortion of the truth.”
*******
Media Monitor by kristina rivera
“One of the trends on the internet today is the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge. One of the first celebrities to do it in the Philippines is Kris Aquino. On her show “Aquino and Abunda” last night (Aug. 25), they aired a short video of other celebrities doing the challenge. Although Kris explained the good cause behind the challenge it seemed more like she was just advertising herself and her good will more than the actual cause. Although Kris may have raised awareness about ALS and the charity, the video seemed like it was highlighting Kris more than anything because at the end they focused on her and even said something along the lines of “and the celebrity who made it all happen” (referring to Kris). I just got the impression that it was more about Kris advertising herself and getting on board the trend than helping out the charity.
“This way of presenting the facts may affect its credibility because it raises the question of whether she was doing it to help the cause or promote herself.
*************
(Note for the student. Dear “wonderstruckwriter”: This example came from me and was discussed extensively in class last week – pls confer with your classmates. The purpose of the weekly media monitor exercise is to contribute in helping the students develop the habit of reading/ viewing the news with a critical eye. The goal would not be met if students are allowed to simply grab case studies taken up in class and pass them off as their own as their own media monitor. You may submit another one as a second chance, in addition to next week’s post, but with deductions, to be fair to your classmates. Also, as a suggestion: if your position is that the name of the subject of the rape-murder should not be disclosed, perhaps it would be good to refrain from disclosing the name in your own published post).
Media Monitor August 20-26, 2014 By Student wonderstruckwriter
gmanetwork.com /news- – – -rape-slay-revives-calls-for-death-penalty
“Rape cases are very sensitive topics to report on. It is because there is the involvement of physical, emotional and mental trauma to the victims and to their families. And although there is the need to report the truth of these matters, the Journalist’s Code of Ethics stated a provision on limiting the information a journalist can write about minors and women involved in criminal cases.
“For this week, A——— (name disclosed by GMA7 News & by student wonderstruckwriter, concealed by blog admin) case has been very present in the media. She became widely known as the 26-year-old victim of the rape-slay case in Calumpit, Bulacan. Causes both online and offline were established in her name (e.g. Justice for A——- ( name disclosed by GMA7 News & by student wonderstruckwriter, concealed by blog admin ) Facebook page, Call to revive death penalty), and stories about her life also emerged on the internet.
“However, I have reservations on how the media has reported on this matter. This reservation stems from the Journalist Code of Ethics provision: “I shall exercise caution in publishing names of minors and women involved in criminal cases so that they may not unjustly lose their standing in society.”
“The provision clearly states what it meant to say, however, it failed to provide a case to when it should be practiced or not. Apparently, this matter is a long-running debate to whether the press have the right to publish rape case victims’ names after death. In practice, though, media practitioners have already settled the matter—if the family has given their consent, then it’s fine.
“Let us examine this one by one. First, the provision’s reason for cautioning the press to publish names of these victims is clear as day—so as they would not ‘unjustly lose their standing in society.’ As I was reading opinions about this on the internet, many surviving rape victims were actually threatened by their peers, ostracized by the people. So I thought maybe this was what the provision was talking about. But does a “standing in society” apply only for living people? Don’t the dead get to have a “standing in society”, more specifically, a legacy?
“Second, as I have mentioned earlier, a family’s consent is the only thing needed for disclosing a rape victim’s name on reports. Regarding this matter, I tried to consider possible reasons to why it is considered ethical to do so. I think that the main reason is because a dead rape victim’s standing in society is reflected by her family, upon disclosure. Personally, when a rape victim’s name appears on the report, I immediately think of the family, and how that certain family recuperates from the tragedy. But to what extent does family have on this matter?
“Third, A——s case (name disclosed by GMA7 News & by student wonderstruckwriter, concealed by blog admin ) did not become a buried case—it actually ignited people’s feelings to address this effectively and even evolving it to become a proof that death penalty should be revived. I am devastated by the fate she suffered, but at least she did not die in vain. Was this because she was named and not one of the other faceless and nameless rape case victims reported? In my opinion, I think that there is something really wrong on how we treat these matters. News has projected a negative image on the ordinary Filipino, and reading about it seems “normal”. But regardless of A ———— (name disclosed by GMA7 News & by student wonderstruckwriter, concealed by blog admin) having been named by the media, shouldn’t the government exert extra effort in implementing its laws and strengthening the justice system?
“My point is, why do the media have to name rape case victims? What significant difference does it make? I think that reporting on the event itself is fine just as it is, or describing the victim is fine just as it is. I believe that a dead victim’s standing in society extends even after death. I believe that not naming a rape victim even after death, is called respect.
“Right now, A———- ( name disclosed by GMA7 News & by student wonderstruckwriter, concealed by blog admin) is making headlines. But she will always be remembered as the 26-year-old rape-slay case victim from Calumpit, Bulacan.”
*****
Discover more from marichulambino.com
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
