Para po ito sa mga mag-aaral ng batas sa media o media law. Karugtong ito ng natapos na talakayan sa klase ukol sa defamation o paninirang puri at ukol sa privileged communication o natatanging pinapahintulutang pahayag bilang eksepsyon sa libelo pananggalang sa libelo.
Natapos natin ang dalawang klase ng privilege, absolute at qualified. Natapos natin ang pitong kategorya ng qualified privileged communication. Natapos natin ang anim na kategorya ng pampublikong opisyal bilang paksa ng privileged communication batay sa jurisprudence. At ang talakayan sa kung sino at ano ang public figure o pampublikong personahe. May sampung kategorya ng kung sinu-sino ang public figure o pampublikong personahe batay sa jurisprudence. At inisa-isa natin ang sampung kategorya na ito. At gamit ang lahat ng batayang prinsipyo na ito, sinuma natin ito sa apat na layers o antas ng Public Figure Doctrine, batay sa jurisprudence. At yung pang-apat na antas, pinalawig natin ang isang bahagdan nito sa tatlo: reckless disregard for the truth, knowledge of falsity, facts to show motive for revenge, all categorized as malice-in-fact… this podcast plays automatically… (this podcast uses a few seconds of music from “Brave” by Sara Bareilles, performed live by Carole King and Sara Bareilles; photo by Myra Lambino; all used here non-commercially for academic purposes)…
Media law final exams today. 1pm exam, finished, examinees have left the room and spread the word, so the 1pm questions are now public. Here’s one of the bonus questions:
For 5 points! (Drumroll…)
66-71) Blogger JLo complained during a press con on the Cybercrime Law that her daughter would not be able to “rant” anymore in Facebook and Twitter whenever she is served “undercooked” or “overcooked” hamburger in Jollibee or McDonald’s because “it would be punishable as libel” under the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. What would you advise JLo, based on your background in media law? Explain.
xxx xxx xxx
i’ll be incommunicado until I’ve submitted the grades. Well, actually, I could still be reached but I won’t reply unless… close po ba tayo? ka-text ko po ba kayo, hindi po, salamat.
For that interregnum, will just be blogposting the amusing answers to the bonus questions starting tomorrow; maybe one a day.
xxx xxx xxx
For this particular question, since there is no particular jurisprudence with exactly the same facts, there are no right and wrong answers; but the examiner is looking for the following: 1)What are the subjects of fair comment? [We took up at least nine (many!) subjects of fair comment, with one of them being so broad as to cover any matter of public interest; and 2)what the criteria for fair comment? Those comments are not libelous. Just state the relevant category and you’ll get the full points.] 3) If the examinee includes the following discussion, he/she will get wild applause from me: When is a so-called “rant”, “joke” etc. (a “like” in FB or a “he-he-he” after a re-tweet) covered by the fair-comment-rule and therefore not libelous? (broad category too; you’ll be happy if you know your media law) Abanganthe sagot! (Watch out for the answers!)
Libel is always content-based, it is not medium-based.
(Palakpakan! applause! big smile! confetti! balloons!)
