(Optionally: if on mobile device, you may click “Listen on browser” on the soundcloud pod below for a song on the most pathetic of miserable creatures called internet bullies) :

4th Media Monitor, regular or any bonus not yet submitted may be posted here

The 4th media monitor, regular or any bonus not yet submitted may be posted here, with deadline extended to Thursday 5pm.

Class members who feel they did not do too well in the exam should take advantage of the media monitor posts to earn points. (one purpose of assigning points to media monitor posts is to balance off the difficulty of the exams).

The 5th bonus is on “fake news” (any falsehood/ lie/ fabrication/ hoax presented as news or as information) disseminated from August 9, 2017 (start of classes in the University) up to the December 6, 2017 (the last day to submit a media monitor post) as follows: A student may describe any fake news item he or she has encountered, or read, or chanced upon in any media (newsprint, online, television, radio, etc.), stating also what outlet or site disseminated the fake news but without embedding the link, and commenting on it, with an explanation of:
1) how the student received or encountered or retrieved the fake news (either as FB news feeds or a shared post or a tweet or a re-tweet, a group email or individual email, a text message, etc.);
2) how he/she knew or determined it was fake news using the provisions taken up in class (cite and quote); and
3)what the student did, or did not do, about it.
(For the full bonus points, items 1-3 must be included in the commentary. ) In the alternative, a student may also comment on any falsity or inaccuracy presented as fact by a public official or a news subject, and reported as news by a media organization without simultaneous fact-checking in the same news report, by that media organization. (do not use those i already used in the exams). (we had the same description of bonus media monitor as early as the first quarter of this year).

The 9th media monitor can be posted here. Students are invited to dedicate their review to Prof. Florinda “Florie” Mateo, PhD, and family — Prof. Florie’s recent work included research in “cultural industries”.

Using the KBP Code of Ethics and the MTRCB guidelines, members of the ethics class may review media content in the form of dramatic, artistic, literary (textual) and other creative work such as those from the:

1.television industry ( students may review content such as telenovelas, variety shows, morning & noontime shows, children’s shows, game shows);

2.music industry (students may review content such as music videos, music streaming, music radio programs);

3.film industry (students may review content such as movies, movie trailers, etc.) ;

4.sports industry (students may review sports as beamed or shown in the media, sports promotions, etc.);

5.entertainment industry (students may review all forms of entertainment as disseminated thru the media including the internet); 6.publishing industry (students may review content in glossy magazines, coffee table books, etc.);

7.advertising industry (students may review advertisements in any form including “outdoor media” or “special media” such as billboards, posters, etc.).

(Photo by Philippine Star, filtered & superimposed with graphics by by blog admin, used here non-commercially for academic purposes)

As discussed before, the review should specify the ethical standards used as basis of the commentary. The review for this media monitor should use not industry standards or genre standards or commercial standards but ethical standards as taken up in class.

Review of media content created by the “cultural industries” will given a bonus score of 10 points. Pls indicate in the title that it is a review of media content created by the “cultural industries” (in memory of Prof. Florie Mateo).

(The regular media monitor will be given the usual maximum of 5 pts).

The usual deadline of Tuesday 7pm applies.

(the “Like” button has been disabled for this post and the previous post)

Tag: media monitor

4th Media Monitor, regular or the 1st/ 2nd / 3rd/ 4th/ 5th bonus

(Optionally: if on mobile device, you may click “Listen on browser” on the soundcloud pod below for a song on the most pathetic of miserable creatures called internet bullies) :

4th Media Monitor, regular or any bonus not yet submitted may be posted here

The 4th media monitor, regular or any bonus not yet submitted may be posted here, with deadline extended to Thursday 5pm.

Class members who feel they did not do too well in the exam should take advantage of the media monitor posts to earn points. (one purpose of assigning points to media monitor posts is to balance off the difficulty of the exams).

9th media monitor: Review of content created by the “Cultural Industries”: Dedicated to Prof. Florinda “Florie” Mateo, Ph.D, & famiy, Florie’s recent work included research in “cultural industries”

The 9th media monitor can be posted here. Students are invited to dedicate their review to Prof. Florinda “Florie” Mateo, PhD, and family — Prof. Florie’s recent work included research in “cultural industries”.

Using the KBP Code of Ethics and the MTRCB guidelines, members of the ethics class may review media content in the form of dramatic, artistic, literary (textual) and other creative work such as those from the:

1.television industry ( students may review content such as telenovelas, variety shows, morning & noontime shows, children’s shows, game shows);

2.music industry (students may review content such as music videos, music streaming, music radio programs);

3.film industry (students may review content such as movies, movie trailers, etc.) ;

4.sports industry (students may review sports as beamed or shown in the media, sports promotions, etc.);

5.entertainment industry (students may review all forms of entertainment as disseminated thru the media including the internet); 6.publishing industry (students may review content in glossy magazines, coffee table books, etc.);

7.advertising industry (students may review advertisements in any form including “outdoor media” or “special media” such as billboards, posters, etc.).

As discussed before, the review should specify the ethical standards used as basis of the commentary. The review for this media monitor should use not industry standards or genre standards or commercial standards but ethical standards as taken up in class.

Review of media content created by the “cultural industries” will given a bonus score of 10 points. Pls indicate in the title that it is a review of media content created by the “cultural industries” (in memory of Prof. Florie Mateo).

(The regular media monitor will be given the usual maximum of 5 pts).

The usual deadline of Tuesday 7pm applies.

(the “Like” button has been disabled for this post and the previous post)

(Optionally: if on mobile device, you may click “Listen on browser” on the soundcloud pod below for a song on the most pathetic of miserable creatures called internet bullies) :

4th Media Monitor, regular or any bonus not yet submitted may be posted here

The 4th media monitor, regular or any bonus not yet submitted may be posted here, with deadline extended to Thursday 5pm.

Class members who feel they did not do too well in the exam should take advantage of the media monitor posts to earn points. (one purpose of assigning points to media monitor posts is to balance off the difficulty of the exams).

click any social media icon below to share

The 9th media monitor can be posted here. Students are invited to dedicate their review to Prof. Florinda “Florie” Mateo, PhD, and family — Prof. Florie’s recent work included research in “cultural industries”.

Using the KBP Code of Ethics and the MTRCB guidelines, members of the ethics class may review media content in the form of dramatic, artistic, literary (textual) and other creative work such as those from the:

1.television industry ( students may review content such as telenovelas, variety shows, morning & noontime shows, children’s shows, game shows);

2.music industry (students may review content such as music videos, music streaming, music radio programs);

3.film industry (students may review content such as movies, movie trailers, etc.) ;

4.sports industry (students may review sports as beamed or shown in the media, sports promotions, etc.);

5.entertainment industry (students may review all forms of entertainment as disseminated thru the media including the internet); 6.publishing industry (students may review content in glossy magazines, coffee table books, etc.);

7.advertising industry (students may review advertisements in any form including “outdoor media” or “special media” such as billboards, posters, etc.).

As discussed before, the review should specify the ethical standards used as basis of the commentary. The review for this media monitor should use not industry standards or genre standards or commercial standards but ethical standards as taken up in class.

Review of media content created by the “cultural industries” will given a bonus score of 10 points. Pls indicate in the title that it is a review of media content created by the “cultural industries” (in memory of Prof. Florie Mateo).

(The regular media monitor will be given the usual maximum of 5 pts).

The usual deadline of Tuesday 7pm applies.

(the “Like” button has been disabled for this post and the previous post)

click any social media icon below to share