FOURTH OF FOUR PARTS Students’ Critique of TV Patrol, n5e.interaksyon, ANC, Jiggy Manicad, Tinig
Media Monitor by Anna Paulina Matillano “Last Aug. 25, I watched the cover of TV Patrol about the people signing the petition for the impeachment of PNOY. There was this portion on the news segment where they said that people there didn’t even know why they are signing in the first place. To solidify their claim, they interviewed people who said that they really didn’t know what was happening, and that they just signed. “In the code of ethics, journalists are supposed to show all sides of the story. As I have seen on the news, I am quite sure that not all people were unaware of the situation. But they just only showed those who were ignorant of it.” ********
Media Monitor by seventeen “There was an audio report released by n5e.interaksyon.com entitled “Menor De Edad na rape victim, pinagtawanan lang daw ng pulis?” The news was about a complaint on the Women’s and Children’s Desk (WCD) of Dasmarinas Cavite. It was said that after filing a complaint against the suspect, the police on duty just laugh and disregard the issue. The reason behind this was that the suspect is a relative of Mayor Jennifer Austria-Barzaga, the City Mayor of Dasma. “According to the code of ethics, journalists should treat sources, subjects and colleagues as human beings deserving of respect. During the interview, Raffy Tulfo keeps on throwing questions to PO2 Mariano. She never enough time to explain their side. An ethical journalist should always give both sides of the story. How can the reporter do this if he wants to emphasize that the police on duty are wrong and that they held liable for that given only the side of the victims. Here’s the link of the audio report: n5e.interaksyon.com/audio-menor-de-edad-na-rape-victim-pinagtawanan-lang-daw-ng-pulis ********** By Kristine “Today, August 26, 2014 a news article was released on ABS-CBN New online. The article is entitled: “Give Miriam a chance, Bernas tells PNoy”. The article is all about an interview done by Fr. Joaquin Bernas on the show “Beyond Politics” in ANC. In the said article, the opinion of Fr. Bernas regarding speculations that the president wants to have his term extension, were stated. “I believe that there was an ethical provision violated here. The article failed to avoid “improper emphasis”. While it’s true that Fr. Bernas said “PNoy must give Miriam a chance”, it’s not really the main point of the said interview and he only said it in a joking manner. The title given to the article was very misleading; if I didn’t bother to read the whole story or listen to the interview I would probably think that Fr. Bernas was somehow endorsing senator Miriam Santiago for the 2016 elections. ( link: abs-cbnnews.com/give-miriam-chance-bernas-tells-pnoy ) ******** Media Monitor by native roses “Above is a YouTube compilation video of Jiggy Manicad’s three failed reports in GMA 7’s ’24 Oras’. “The first few seconds of the video showed Manicad’s first mistake in terms of reporting the right and proper news to his audiences. He said, “Mike, nasa labing libong libong extra nga ang kukunin nga daw…” Even though the video only showed the part where he committed a mistake by not saying the exact and right number of extras or by sharing a very vague information, I managed to find the full version of the interview to see if in some way, he at least tried to rectify his error. The full version of Manicad’s interview, however, justified that there was no correction of substantive errors. “On his third report (according to the order of reports in the video), Manicad said, “Labing walong oras ang inabot bago matunton ang bangkay ng isang batang pitong taong gulang na nalunod sa Pasig River. Aksidente lang umanong nahulog ang ilog sa bata… o ang bata sa ilog.” It was an obvious mistake and even though he corrected himself, the message sent was still unclear to people. I guess in some way, people would automatically get the hint of him correcting himself when he said “…o ang bata sa ilog,” but to some, especially to overthinkers in which I can actually relate to in so many levels, it might probably appear as if it was one way or the other. The river might have fallen to the child OR the the child might have fallen to the river. I know that to some people this is purely illogical, but I think the main job of a reporter is to clarify and give accurate details to his or her listeners to avoid misunderstanding and passing of wrong information. “On his second report, however, Manicad apologized for his mistake and corrected himself promptly. “Yung composition kanina nakita natin yung pagdagsa rin ng mga tae… ah, sorry po… ng mga tao.” His coverage was clear, and to that, I praise him for it is great to correct oneself when one has committed a mistake, honest or not. xxx” *********** Weekly Media Monitor (Aug. 20 – 26) by itsthemediamill.wordpress Article: tinigngplaridel/cmcsc-inherits-debt-from-past-members “On the 20th of August 2014, Tinig ng Plaridel, the official student publication of the UP Diliman College of Mass Communication, published a controversial article entitled, “CMCSC inherits debt from past members”. It reports that the current student council has to deal with the debts of their predecessors, and it is emphasized that two former council members who wish to remain anonymous lent their own money to fund the projects. I found many things about this article that were questionably ethical. “First, the headline. The headline is worded in a way that it makes the previous council look bad. It presents them in a bad light, as if they have neglected their duties and let their successors deal with the consequences. The promotional strategy used in releasing this article was through sharing the link on the Tinig ng Plaridel staff’s individual Facebook accounts. On a platform where posts are only seen for a few seconds, the headline can really cause alarm, especially since the word “debt” has a bad connotation. A journalist, according to the SPJ Code of Ethics, should make certain that headlines, news teases and promotional material, photos, video, audio, graphics, sound bites, and quotations do not misrepresent. “Second, the fact that the two council members’ identities were not disclosed, and their reason in doing so was not mentioned as well. Yes, generally people have the right to choose to be anonymous, however a journalist must question the motives when they choose to. Since this is the student council, politics plays a huge role here. News must be impartial, no matter what color you support. “That brings me to the third thing. Why was there only one source? The previous CMCSC should have been interviewed as well, as to explain what really happened straight from the horse’s mouth. It is a journalist’s duty to present news as accurately as possibly, and the most effective way to do so is by getting all possible information from all vantage points, especially since these are testimonials. “Lastly, I want to point out how the only listed event/project that was explored was Gawad Daluyong. This move, I think, wants to brand Gawad Daluyong as a train-wreck of a project. The article even states that the winners only received a trophy, and not the cash prize that was promised. What’s the story behind Siklab? Was it not also a notable project that garnered a pretty reasonable portion in the pie chart? “As media practitioners, we must make sure that we publish balanced news, no matter what our views are. If we let politics cloud our judgment, then the truthfulness and accuracy of the article might be compromised.” *******************
FIRST OF FOUR PARTS (excerpted, quoted verbatim, unedited: grammatical and idiomatic errors have not been corrected)
For substance, the authors got points except as otherwise stated under “notes” for the student.
(blog admin’s note on the fifth post here: There is a continuing debate as to whether or not children who have been killed should be named in news stories as news subjects. Some news editors argue that since they are deceased, the restraint should be relaxed. i disagree with this – but there it is. This debate has not been resolved.)
*******
The Derailing of the Public by Student mediamonitor2014.wordpress On the article: “MRT train crashes through barrier” from The Philippine Star: “… journalists viewed the story in a macro-level perspective. They were agreeable in giving out facts that support their claims, however they were not able to gather the story in a more “humanly experience” by interviewing passengers or witnesses. In another level, journalists are supposed to “give voice to the voiceless”, in this case, the victims of the incident. In the context of truthfulness, the concept of triangulation is vital to be able to satisfy the contents of the news report. Being able to conduct triangulation involves all the sides of the story to be able to achieve a sound and unbiased report of details. Thus, in this example, we also see the violation of the first policy in The Philippine Journalist’s Code of Ethics which states that “…I recognize the duty to air the other side,” something the news lacked. They featured a lot of important stakeholders such as government officials and DOTC representatives that are strong voices to the issue, but its strongest hold would be the inclusion of what those who experienced it may think. What did the passengers feel? How do they see Philippine transportation after this incident has happened? xxx” ******* Media Monitor by Angel or mannequinreverie “… Philippine Daily Inquirer: I found two articles that devoted themselves to the purpose of airing all sides to a conflict. The issue was between Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV and the Makati City government; the former accused the latter of being more corrupt than those involved in the P10-billion pork barrel scam. An issue like this can easily blow up in a sense that one side can be highlighted more than the other thereby leading to unnecessary biases. “… they made sure to air all sides of the conflict by laying down the arguments of each side and therefore allowing the readers to decide for themselves. They’ve accommodated Sen. Trillanes’ allegations in the article, “Trillanes: Scam in Makati bigger than pork theft”. But they didn’t stop there. They made sure to seek out the Makati City government to respond to those allegations; they’ve featured their side in the article, “Makati gov’t to Triplanes: What corruption?” By placing these articles together, the Inquirer managed to present the issue objectively, air all sides equally, and give the readers a platform to weigh each side critically.xxx” ********
Weekly Media Monitor (Aug. 20-26) by gianco in giancoante.wordpress Article: lifestyle.inquirer.holdup-gangs-still-on-the-loose-in-makatis-chino-roces-avenue “According to the preamble of the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics, it is the duty of a journalist to seek the truth and to provide a “fair and comprehensive account of events and issues.” This is the primary duty of a journalist that is, unfortunately, not always carried out in the media. “ “These are dangerous times to be working or living in the vicinity of Makati’s Chino Roces Avenue…” “The article starts out with this sensationalized statement about Chino Roces Avenue. It is the job of a journalist to objectively present the truth–not to strike fear into the hearts of the people with a hasty generalization. “ “In recent weeks, the situation has become too prevalent and so close to home, with at least four Inquirer employees being held up on different occasions.” “The example above was taken from the third paragraph of the article. The article fails to give a detailed account of the holdups. There are no specific dates and times–only the phrase “recent weeks”. The use of the phrases “at least” and “different occasions” shows that the journalist is even unsure of the facts. Another thing to note is that the journalist reports that the victims were Inquirer employees. What about the other victims in the area who aren’t Inquirer employees? Would this article have been written even if the victims aren’t Inquirer employees? A journalist should avoid media bias and give voice to the voiceless. “ “What adds insult to injury is that the cops seem helpless, if not oblivious, to the crimes…” “The opening line of the fourth paragraph shows another hasty generalization. The journalist does not provide evidence to support his/her claim. “ “one of the police officers was said to have commented that they lack manpower and that the criminals know what areas to avoid.” “The journalist failed to identify the police officer from whom he/she got the information. A journalist should identify sources whenever feasible because the public is entitled to know the reliability of the sources. “The article is written almost like a personal rant. There are no specific dates and times for each occurrence of the holdups. The victims are all identified as Inquirer employees, showing possible media bias. The sources are not identified and there is no evidence to support the journalist’s claim of police incompetence. Worst of all, hasty generalizations abound. The article is proof that there are journalists out there in the mainstream that cannot even carry out the most basic of duties: to provide a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues.” ************ Media Monitor by By Shain Bianca “(On) 92.3 Aksyon Radyo Singko… show, hosted by Martin Andanar and Erwin Tulfo, Punto Asintado ….which focus on news, tackled the arrest of a drug dealer in Quezon City. xxx “On the flip side, Mr. Tulfo and Mr. Andanar focused more on the slapping incident that the former said that slapping the drug dealer was not enough. According to him, if he were there, he would do more than that. He would get the gun of the police beside him and inflict serious harm on the person. For me, that was totally uncalled for. According to Journalist Code of Ethics, “I shall conduct myself in public or while performing my duties as journalist in such manner as to maintain the dignity of my profession. When in doubt, decency should be my watchword.” In my opinion, Mr. Tulfo used his job as a broadcast journalist to air those words. He should have acted with greater caution because children listening might think that it is okay to hurt or kill someone because that person did something bad. (I was with a little kid when I was listening to them and he asked if it’s okay to do that). Even if what the drug dealer did was wrong, it is not the job of the broadcast journalist to say such words or do such things. We should let the justice system do its job instead.xxx xxx . QC Mayor Herbert Bautista … slapped him (the suspect) because of his rude behavior. The two shows labeled the drug dealer as Chinese, which clearly did not have anything to do with his monkey business. On a side note, even TV news programs labeled him Chinese. As I see it, it violated the provision in the Journalist Code of Ethics that says, “I shall not, in any manner, ridicule, cast aspersions on, or degrade any person by reason of sex, creed, religious belief, political conviction, cultural and ethnic origin.” We do not label Filipino drug dealers or users as “Filipino drug users/ dealers.” In our discussion, it was said that ethnicity or origin may be placed towards within the report so as to provide additional information but not to the extent that it becomes part of the headline. But what newspapers, TV programs, and radio programs did was they headlined his being Chinese.xxx”
************
(Note for the post below: Dear Student serendipity: As discussed in class, names of minors involved in crimes, whether as suspects or complainants, should be concealed; likewise, the real names of individuals who are complainants/subjects of rape, sexual harassment, acts of lasciviousness, etc., should also be not disclosed; but in all other cases, generally, adult suspects/accused should be identified in news stories, otherwise the crime report would be incomplete, vague, and abstract (unless there is a compelling reason not to name them).
The case studies discussed in class for “minimizing harm” and not destroying an individual’s reputation unless warranted, involved stories based on blanket accusations published as news stories without any basis whatsoever, or without the news organization having verified the accusation (independent ways of verification were taken up in class when i discussed whistleblowers’ stories — pls confer with your classmates). The nature of crime reports would have been taken up in your J101: that is, an investigation report by the police verified by the reporter can be the basis of a news story taking into consideration all the standards of journalism (being balanced, factual, etc.).
This post does not get any points but since you may not have yet taken up J101, I will allow you to submit another one, with deductions, to be fair to your classmates, in addition to next week’s media monitor — but only for this time).
By serendipity 2012- 15827 “xxx An August 25, 2014 article from Manila Bulletin (mb.com.ph3-arrested-p75m-shabu-seized-in-buy-bust) about a buy-bust operation in Quezon City caught my attention. In the article, the author indicated the names of the three suspects as well as their age, occupation, and home addresses. In my opinion, there is no need to include such information as it was an intrusion into the individuals’ privacy. “Also, I think that the information provided was not relevant to the execution of the crime. Therefore, it may be considered a violation against the rights of the three named suspects.
“As media practitioners, we must be extra careful in handling and disclosing information to the public. ********
The deadline is Sept. 2 at 5pm. Posts submitted after 5pm of Tuesday will no longer be considered as a second post but will be credited under the Sept.3-8 media monitor. The results of last week’s media monitor will be posted today, in four parts, entitled as follows:
“Students’ Critique of Phil Star, Inquirer, Tulfo & Andanar” (first of four parts) – Abangan! in two minutes
“Students’ Critique of ABS-CBN, GMA7 News, News Aksyon 5, Rappler, Kris Aquino” (second of four parts) – Abangan! mayamaya
“Students’ critique of Inquirer, ABS-CBN, GMA7, yugatech site” (3rd of four parts) – Abangan! Malapit na.
“Students’ Critique of TV Patrol, n5e.interaksyon, ANC, Jiggy Manicad, Tinig” (4th of four parts) – Abangan!
Authors got the full points except as otherwise stated under “notes” for the student.
This week’s media monitor can be posted in the comments box below by clicking the “comment” prompt below the “like” box, below the date; or below the related posts if you opened your window to this post itself. Please submit them either as inline text or as links to your platforms where the commentary is posted.(you may also email them). Happy viewing and reading!
