Newspeg: “Two TV crew members who disappeared along with a Jordanian journalist last June were “recovered” in Sulu Saturday night, but police could not immediately say if ransom was paid for their release.” (gmanetwork.com/news)
Last year, in the aftermath of the kidnapping of three members of the Red Cross by the Abu Sayyaf, the Sulu governor organized private armies, issued a proclamation declaring a state of emergency, imposed curfew, and called out the police and the armed forces to conduct warrantless searches, seizures, and arrests. Several residents were warrantlessly arrested and detained on no probable cause except the mere affidavit of a policeman that they were Abu Sayyaf members.
The Supreme Court in a case promulgated seven months ago unanimously held: 1.The commander-in-chief powers (“calling out” powers) are vested by the Constitution only on the President; 2. the governor has no such commander-in-chief powers, and cannot on his own organize private armies. Here’s the case (excerpted):
Jamar M. Kulayan, Temogen S. Tulawie, Hji. Moh. Yusop Ismi, Julhajan Awadi, SPO1 Sattal H. Jadjuli, Petitioners, (as taxpayers and residents of Sulu) vs. Gov. Abdusakur M. Tan in his capacity as governor of Sulu, Gen. Juancho Saban, Col. Eugenio Clemen PN, P/ Supt. Julasurim Kasim, and P/Supt. Bienvenido G. Latag, in their capacity as officers of the Phil. Marines and PNP, Respondents.
G.R. NO. 187298 July 3, 2012. en banc.
Sereno, J.
“On 15 January 2009, three members of the International Committee of the Red Cross were kidnapped … in Patikul, Sulu. xxx
xxx
“The leader of the alleged kidnappers was identified as Raden Abu, a former guard at the Sulu Provincial Jail. News reports linked Abu to Albader Parad, one of the known leaders of the Abu Sayyaf. xxx
xxx
“Governor Tan organized the Civilian Emergency Force (CEF), a group of armed male civilians coming from different municipalities, who were redeployed to surrounding areas of Patikul.
xxx
“The organization of the CEF was embodied in a “Memorandum of Understanding” entered into between three parties: the provincial government of Sulu, represented by Governor Tan; the Armed Forces of the Philippines, represented by Gen. Saban; and the Philippine National Police, represented by P/SUPT. Latag.
xxx
“The Whereas clauses of the Memorandum alluded to the extraordinary
situation in Sulu, and the willingness of civilian supporters of the municipal
mayors to offer their services in order that “the early and safe rescue of the
hostages may be achieved.” xxx
“On 31 March 2009, Governor Tan issued Proclamation No. 1, Series of 2009 (Proclamation 1-09), declaring a state of emergency in the province of Sulu. It cited the kidnapping incident as a ground for the said declaration, xxx
xxx
“In the same Proclamation, respondent Tan called upon the PNP and the CEF to set up checkpoints and chokepoints, conduct general search and seizures including arrests, and other actions necessary to ensure public safety. The pertinent portion of the proclamation states:
“Now, therefore, by virtue of the powers vested in my by law, I, Abdusakur Mahail Tan, Governor of the Province of Sulu, do hereby declare a state of emergency in the province of Sulu, and call on the Philippine National Police with the assistance of the Armed Forces of the Philippines and the Civilian Emergency Force to implement the following:
“1. The setting-up of checkpoints and chokepoints in the province;
“2. The imposition of curfew for the entire province subject to such Guidelines as may be issued by proper authorities;
“3. The conduct of General Search and Seizure including arrests in the pursuit of the kidnappers and their supporters; and
“4. To conduct such other actions or police operations as may be necessary to ensure public safety. xxx”
xxx
“On 1 April 2009, SPO1 Sattal Jadjuli was instructed by his superior to report to respondent P/SUPT. Julasirim Kasim. Upon arriving at the police station, he was booked, and interviewed about his relationship to Musin, Jaiton, and Julamin, who were all his deceased relatives. Upon admitting that he was indeed related to the three, he was detained. After a few hours, former Punong Barangay Juljahan Awadi, Hadji Hadjirul Bambra, Abdugajir Hadjirul, as well as PO2 Marcial Hajan, SPO3 Muhilmi Ismula, Punong Barangay Alano Mohammad and jeepney driver Abduhadi Sabdani, were also arrested. The affidavit of the apprehending officer alleged that they were suspected ASG supporters and were being arrested under Proclamation 1-09. The following day, 2 April 2009, the hostage Mary Jane Lacaba was released by the ASG. xxx
xxx
“On 16 April 2009, Jamar M. Kulayan, Temogen S. Tulawie, Hadji Mohammad Yusop Ismi, Ahajan Awadi, and SPO1 Sattal H. Jadjuli, residents of Patikul, Sulu, filed the present Petition for Certiorari and Prohibition, claiming that roclamation 1-09 was issued with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction, as it threatened fundamental freedoms guaranteed under Article III of the 1987 Constitution. xxx
xxx
(The Supreme Court unanimously struck down the governor’s Proclamation 1-09 as unconstitutional on the following grounds: )
“II. Only the President is vested with calling-out powers, as the commander-in-chief of the Republic . The exceptional character of Commander-in-Chief powers dictate that they are exercised by one president.
xxx
“(I)t is clear that the framers never intended for local chief executives to exercise unbridled control over the police in emergency situations. This is without prejudice to their authority over police units in their jurisdiction as provided by law, and their prerogative to seek assistance from the police in day to day situations, as contemplated by the Constitutional Commission. But as a civilian agency of the government, the police, through the NAPOLCOM, properly comes within, and is subject to, the exercise by the President of the power of executive control.
xxx
“The provincial governor does not possess the same calling-out powers as the President. Given the foregoing, respondent provincial governor is not endowed with the power to call upon the armed forces at his own bidding. In issuing the assailed proclamation, Governor Tan exceeded his authority when he declared a state of emergency and called upon the Armed Forces, the police, and his own Civilian Emergency Force. The calling-out powers contemplated under the Constitution is exclusive to the President.
xxx
“Taken in conjunction with each other, it becomes clear that the Constitution does not authorize the organization of private armed groups similar to the CEF convened by the respondent Governor.
Newspeg: The POEA issued press releases promoting its seminars for OFWs, for a fee, but maybe the better story might have been its disclosure or confirmation that rampant illegal recruitment and human trafficking remain unabated in at least ten provinces, including Isabela, Quirino, Batangas, and Pampanga.
The following are the pertinent provisions criminalizing human trafficking with a maximum penalty of twenty years’ imprisonment:
“Anti-Trafficking of Persons Act” (Republic Act No. 9208)
xxx
“Section 4. Acts of Trafficking in Persons. – It shall be unlawful for any person, natural or juridical, to commit any of the following acts:
(a) To recruit, transport, transfer; harbor, provide, or receive a person by any means, including those done under the pretext of domestic or overseas employment or training or apprenticeship, for the purpose of prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
(b) To introduce or match for money, profit, or material, economic or other consideration, any person or, as provided for under Republic Act No. 6955, any Filipino woman to a foreign national, for marriage for the purpose of acquiring, buying, offering, selling or trading him/her to engage in prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
(c) To offer or contract marriage, real or simulated, for the purpose of acquiring, buying, offering, selling, or trading them to engage in prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor or slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
(d) To undertake or organize tours and travel plans consisting of tourism packages or activities for the purpose of utilizing and offering persons for prostitution, pornography or sexual exploitation;
(e) To maintain or hire a person to engage in prostitution or pornography;
(f) To adopt or facilitate the adoption of persons for the purpose of prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery, involuntary servitude or debt bondage;
(g) To recruit, hire, adopt, transport or abduct a person, by means of threat or use of force, fraud, deceit, violence, coercion, or intimidation for the purpose of removal or sale of organs of said person; and
(h) To recruit, transport or adopt a child to engage in armed activities in the Philippines or abroad.”
Senator Pia nag-react sa apology ni Gigi (COS, Juan Ponce Enrile) – Episode 7 Reality TV (Senate of the Philippines)
Posted here at 4:38 pm. From abs-cbn news [the full text of the statement is not linked in the news article; neither is it linked in Senator Pia Cayetano’s twitter account or posted anywhere in the net (I would have published it in full here) ; anyway, in the interest of… presenting all episodes of the Reality TV, Senate of the Philippines, here’s the gist of Senator Pia Cayetano’s statement today in response to the public apology and statement of Atty. Gigi Reyes yesterday]:
“In her public apology, Atty. Gigi Reyes said she understood the depth of the Senate President’s personal hurt involving me and my brother. The reason was deeply rooted, she hinted, but did not proceed to reveal it… xxx
“With all honesty, I cannot think of any other issue, apart from the RH and Sin Tax laws, that might have caused Senate President Enrile to feel so strongly against me. I know he was not happy with me regarding Sin Tax because he asked for my removal from the bicameral conference committee on Sin Tax. And of course, we all know our views on RH were poles apart … xxx
Referring to her personal and professional relationship with Enrile: “ (It) had always been good.”
“That’s why in my speech last Tuesday [January 22], I asked the Senate President whether I was being penalized for speaking my mind. But assuming that what Atty. Reyes said was true – that Senator Enrile had deeper reasons for resenting my brother and I – is that an acceptable reason for him to act against a colleague? Does it mean that if any of the senators displease him in any way, he can arbitrarily act and treat us differently? ‘Pag di sya happy sa ‘yo, pwede ka nyang api-apihin?”
– Excerpts of the Statement of Senator Pia Cayetano (full statement not posted in the net)