more ramblings on, holiday

bruegel.jpg

Jan Brueghel the Elder. Allegory of Hearing. 1618. Oil on wood. Museo del Prado, Madrid, Spain. Right-clicked from http://www.abcgallery.com

 

While in practice, and like many if not all lawyers, we invoke specific laws (in a legal positivist manner, in the great grand tradition of “rule of law”) i never actually use the phrase “rule of law” in pleadings, motions, statements, etc., although it is the concept and principle we use in practice, all lawyers are trained to go by it. When i was a freshman in law school i used the phrase once in a statement or a speech, and then Law Student Government president Manny Goyena saw it, pinagalitan ako! (he scolded me!), but in a funny way, he scolded me in a funny way, and said, “ba’t mo ginagamit yan `rule of law’! Hindi natin ginagamit yan!” (“Why are you using that phrase “rule of law”, we don’t use that.”). He was ahead of me in law school, a senior student and we were both in the alliance (Students’ Rights and Welfare Alliance, i think that alliance holds the distinction of being the first to wrest from the dictatorship, during the dark years of martial rule when students were being “salvaged” and when organizations were banned, the right of students to have a student government. I think).

 

Anyway, if you’re ahead of me in year level and if you’re an alliance-member, you’re allowed to scold me. So i said, “eh nabasa ko sa libro eh” (“i read it in the book.”). Ngek. And he said, “Hindi natin ginagamit ‘yan, si Marcos lang gumagamit nyan.” (“we don’t use that phrase, only Marcos uses that.”). Much later on, Marvic Leonen, or i think it was someone else, explained to me that the “constitutional authoritarianism” of Marcos taught us that what is legal is not necessarily just, that’s why he, or we, don’t use that phrase.

 

Mga astig ano?. (I don’t have a translation of astig. They had a firm grasp of the law and how to fight for what was just).

 

Manny Goyena later on of course was one of the leading post-Marcos human rights lawyers, he together with friends, founded Alterlaw, i saw in Google that he’s in Geneva lawyering for organizations and Filipino migrants. Marvic, as everyone knows, founded one of the first environmental legal resources center, and later on was asked to be General Counsel of U.P., then Vice President for Legal of U.P.

 

So, from then, i never used that phrase. Baka biglang may umalingawngaw sa kaliwa at kanang tenga ko (a boom might suddenly echo from my left and right ear): “Ba’t mo ginagamit yan!” (“Why are you using that phrase!”)

 

Although in reality all lawyers have been trained to be legal positivists: Find a law or rule, if there’s none, dig up one; if you can’t find one, go back to ancient times, go back to the Romans for chrissake just find a law or precedent, short of going back to pre-history.

 

And that’s the pre-history of that.

 

 

How to stop the opposition senators

degas_ballet1.jpg “The Rehearsal” by Edgar Degas 1879 from www.bc.edu

Stopping the senators from playing the tapes

Is like…

(wait, I haven’t thought of an alliteration yet)

The Senate by a majority vote, in order to understand the testimonies, will play the Hello Garci tapes or parts of it.

Admin senators who do not want them to play the tapes can go to the Supreme Court on a petition for certiorari and prohibition. In order to succeed in getting a TRO, petitioners will have to show that: 1)they will suffer an irreparable injury; or 2) they have a clear, legal right that’s being violated; or 3) something is unconstitutional (no law is being challenged so I’m using the word “something”).

What is the irreparable injury to the petitioners, or the clear legal right that’s being violated? They do not want the tapes played because it is a “violation of RA 4200”. What is the injury to the petitioners? They might be held “criminally liable”. Then, walk away. There’s a remedy. (an injunction on a petition for certiorari is an extraordinary remedy available only when there is no other recourse in the ordinary course of the law etc. ). Walk away from the scene. Put one foot in front of the other. It’s real easy. “Criminal liability”, if any, is personal.

But we don’t want the Senate to be “criminally liable”. Only living natural persons can be punished for crimes; the “criminal liability”, if any, cannot apply to a non-natural person.

Only those individuals who stand to suffer a grave and irreparable injury, can invoke the ground of grave and irreparable injury. And these are the individuals whose phones were tapped or whose conversations were recorded: the woman who sounded like Gloria; and Garci; and other public officials/ figures.

What about: the resolution is unconstitutional because it violates the right to privacy in the Bill of Rights? The Supreme Court has ruled in many cases that only the person whose right to privacy is being violated, can invoke it.

So, a TRO against the Senate to stop it from playing the tapes on a certiorari petition filed by admin senators, may be difficult to wangle. They can file criminal complaints later but criminal complaints do not work as an injunction. There will be a preliminary investigation, a resolution, then if there’s a prima facie case, an indictment.

I’ll tell you what…Maybe you can theorize… that while they’re playing the tapes… they are in the process of….committing a crime….(you said it was a violation of RA 4200)…and they can be warrantlessly arrested…on the spot…it’s in the Rules of Court…and you get to stop the tapes from being played…on the spot…the only person able to do so….Don’t tell anyone that came from me!

But can you imagine the spectacle of that? Senate President Manny Villar being hauled off by the police or NBI, and the senators each being handcuffed or taken away or Mirandized. Unthinkable. Not politically advisable.

I just like twirling the procedure, the Rules of Court, turning them on their head. That is the effect, this morning, we had our flowing yoga poses for one hour and I kept tipping. Tipping. Tipping. And it made me laugh. And I lost my concentration. I think I almost made my yoga teacher laugh.

I’m really glad we don’t have to do this on a cliff.

(stopping the senators

from playing the tapes

is like stopping my

li’l tree-pose from tipping.)