tap the play arrow (if on mobile device, click “Listen in browser”) on the soundcloud pod below for :
“i need you…
like a heart needs a beat…”
like…
The House bill granting a 5-month franchise to ABS-CBN approved within one day on second reading will, at best, take a month to take effect. Meanwhile, the illegal shutdown of a news media organization (television and radio), made summarily and without a hearing, continues.
The NTC has apologized to Congress for failure to notify the House of the sudden shutdown against ABS-CBN (in response to a show-cause order why NTC should not be cited in contempt.)
The illegality persists.
In the meantime, Supreme Court justices have apparently not read the petition, as it will be taken up only on May 19. The justices are also on lockdown, perhaps, also “not aware”.
“Every moment’s continuance …” of this prior restraint “amounts to a flagrant, indefensible, and continuing violation of the First Amendment (the right to freedom of speech and freedom of the press)” (paraphrasing a Supreme Court justice).
(Photo credits: From Pexels of the WordPress Free Stock Library)
UPDATE (Correction) : The deadline as stated is Wednesday — Wednesday is Oct. 16, not 14. Apologies.
Law on Mass Media 5th Exercise Prior Restraint 10pts Deadline Oct. 16
To cap the section on the right to freedom from prior restraint, choose one problem and provide the answer; then, illustrate the problem by describing an event/ an article / social media post (if social media post, redact/ remove the url and any real name and make sure you have it in your print notes as it will be retrieved in class) :
Choose one:
1.Whenever Twitter/FB takes down a tweet/post, or takes down an account, is it a form of presumptively unconstitutional prior restraint as illustrated in the cases taken up? Why or why not? (cite case or authorities) Illustrate the problem by providing a tweet/post/ account that was taken down. (time frame: 2009-2019)
Or
2.Whenever a government agency requires a TV show (teleserye or otherwise) or radio program (any format), before airing, to submit to it (the government agency) a script or the episode itself before broadcast, is it a form of prior restraint? (cite case or authorities) Why or why not? Illustrate the problem by describing an event or providing an article/ report of an event or situation that illustrates the problem. (time frame: 2009-2019)
Or
3.Whenever threats of closing down or non-renewal of franchise resulting in closure or filing of cases resulting in closure are made against a media organization, do the threats create a “chilling effect” that operate as a form of prior restraint? Why of why not? (cite case or authorities). Illustrate the problem by describing an event or providing an article/ report of an event or situation that illustrates the problem. (time frame: 2009-2019)
4. In your opinion, whenever the MTRCB issues a ten-word notice of an X-rating on a film, is it a form of prior restraint? Why or why not? Illustrate the problem by describing an event or providing an article/ report of an event or situation that illustrates the problem. (time frame: 2009-2019)
(NOTE: class members are not allowed to copy the illustration already provided by another class member (earlier or priorly) – it pays to post promptly 😊 )
For ten points: Deadline, Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 5pm.
(Update: “Bliss” has been provided as illustration by class member Sy at 10:37am today Oct. 14. All who use this as an illustration after that will not get credit — Pls read again the instructions. Reading is a good practice. See also that the time frame is the entire decade. Marami pong salamat.)
Law on Mass Media Advance Post, 4th Exercise, Deadline Feb. 28
This is an advance post. (for class members who have not been attending classes and who are not aware of the exercises, please see previous posts: This is an advance post. The deadline for the current exercise provided here last week is Feb. 20, scroll to view that exercise)
Here is the advance post: Law on Mass Media Fourth Exercise, due only after the discussion on the topic and cases on “Right to Freedom from Prior Restraint”
This is an exercise given in advance, the deadline is on February 28, 2019 at 4pm Thursday. Class members may post in advance of the class discussion if they feel they are already familiar with the topic and cases, as follows:
1.Any news report of the period August 2018 to the present of an event (domestic or worldwide) that illustrates prior restraint or the right to freedom from prior restraint. (do not repeat materials that have been posted on this site before — those who do will get zero without prejudice to any other appropriate actions).
Optionally, as a bonus for another 10 pts:
2. Any news report of an event that illustrates censorship in film or the movies in the last ten years, worldwide (with same instructions (those who are posting a bonus –for ease of reviewing– should state “Bonus”) (Photo from the U.P. Media and Public Relations Office, graphics embedded by blog admin, used here non-commercially for academic purposes)
