Law on Mass Media and Communication 8th Exercise Fair Comment and what can be considered as not a fair comment (abuse of free speech)
        Based on the legitimate subjects of fair comment as discussed in jurisprudence and taken up in class (
1.Affairs of the state, the workings of government, acts of governance, and acts of public officials; 2.The manner of administering public institutions such as educational, religious, charitable institutions; 3.The quality of public infrastructure, public works, public utilities; 4.The work of employees and personnel in public utilities, public works, public infrastructure, public services; 5.Consumer products; 6.Advertisements; 7.Literary and artistic work including films, exhibits; 8.Public entertainments (all kinds as long as these are publicly shown such as TV shows); 9.Involvement in public events such as sports, fashion shows, performances; 10.…and a catch-all category — “Appeals to the public”) and
and the standards for fair comment (it must be on a legitimate subject of fair comment; it must be based on an actual event or must have some basis in fact; and it must be the author’s honest opinion),
give three examples of comments as tweets or FB posts or Instagram comments (redact the URLs and names; redact profanities and curse words ) that are NOT considered as fair comment and are in fact abusive behavior online. In order to avoid confusion, make sure you use the heading : ABUSIVE BEHAVIOR ONLINE in your post [Timeframe: comments (tweets, IG comments, FB posts) from August 15, 2019 to November 21, 2019].

           The deadline is at 1pm Thursday November 21, 2019.

15 thoughts on “Law on Mass Media 8th Exercise Fair Comment & what can be considered as not a fair comment (abuse of free speech)”

  1. For “Shane”: Thank you for this. The post on google drive cannot be opened/cannot be viewed as it requires a password, hence, since it cannot be deciphered/read much less evaluated by any human other than the password-owned, no points can be humanly given. Pls see instructions given at the beginning of the class. Marami pong salamat. -marichu
    xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx
    ABUSIVE BEHAVIOR ONLINE

    https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-_iVjj248eEtcR5BHN7FY0MbNfrl9Biq

  2. Abusive Behavior Online

    The three examples I gave are comments posted on Instagram and Twitter posts of public figures – Korean idol Sulli, Korean hip hop artist Choiza, and YouTube influencer Michelle Dy. Although their posts appeal to the public, the comments posted on their accounts have no basis in fact. The comments are malicious and simply proliferate hate for them and are therefore considered abusive behavior online.

    Here are the comments posted: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YFXW-pgJ4nKpRED_UaTOgGNeXtrGYU8S?usp=sharing

If the comment posted does not appear here, that's because COMMENTS WITH SEVERAL HYPERLINKS ARE DETAINED BY AKISMET AT THE SPAM FOLDER.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.