The Buzz takes up the nature of Facebook as medium

Photo by abs-cbn.com, used here for non-commericial, academic discussion

“The Buzz!” (of ABS-CBN Channel 2) in a short segment today takes up Facebook, and the nature of the “social media”, using as illustration the Facebook accounts of movie stars and their shoutbox, in particular the Facebook shoutbox entry of movie star and film director Gina Alajar on Jinkee Pacquiao, Manny Pacquiao, and Krista Ranillo; in other words, Facebook entries by public figures discussing public figures.

There are no laws in the Philippines on the “social media”, so the interview raised issues. Abangan! it’s on ABS-CBN Channel 2, 4:00pm to 6:00 pm,  the legal discussion is there, not here.

The  issues (legal)  are: What is the nature of the “social media”? Is it a form of media (public) rather than a form of private communication  [i.e. private communication in contemplation of our Hispanic Civil Code (of Spanish colonial era vintage) which contemplated sealed letters (paper, print) in its provisions on private communication] ?  If the social media were a form of media rather than private communication, is it then covered by media law rather than by the laws on private communication?  the legal opinion is in the interview, abangan.  All  Facebook users, whether using the “privacy settings” or not — and, as i understand it, there are about four billion owners and users of Facebook account worldwide (you could say Barack Obama was catapulted to power through Facebook…..okay, i’m exaggerating, but he had millions and millions of friends in his Facebook account during the campaign) –- watch out for the short segment.  The interview basically raises legal issues not yet addressed by jurisprudence in this country.

The Buzz is hosted by Boy Abunda, Kris Aquino, and Ruffa Gutierrez.

(be back in a bit i’m out for a run before people start coming out i’ll be back to polish this in a little while)

(viewer discretion advised for the photo) interested parties waging a disinformation campaign

I apologize for posting the photo below  and i will pixelize the grisly part  24 hours from this posting. There are people subtly waging a disinformation campaign by saying that there was no mutilation that went on when the 57 unarmed civilians,  including more than 13 journalists on coverage of election activities and two lawyers assisting their clients (including passers-by who were on their way home or to work), were slaughtered in the morning of Nov. 23 on the way to the Comelec office in Sharif Aguak, Maguindanao for filing of certificates of candidacy; and that all those who were slain were on the payroll of one of the parties anyway, as if any part of that disinformation would make the butchering that day “neater”.

Swell.

This photo was shot by Agence France Presse and published by Yahoo News Philippines (www.ph.yahoo), it will be pixelized here 24 hours from this posting, again i apologize if this photo offends you, it needs to be seen, at least for a day. It will be pixelized after today.

Photo by Agence France Presse published by ph.yahoo.com , grisly part covered by blog admin

The blog will be posting an entry on the Maguindanao Massacre for each day that not a single arrest is made and not a single armed goon is disarmed in Maguindanao. 4th day.