(Final cut). No full breast exposure; photo manipulated: Investigation by “The Buzz”


Still from a video by "The Buzz", ABS-CBN, used here for academic purposes

Thank you to “The Buzz” show for  the interview! (and the good shots — in real life, the blog admin looks like a sea hag; ABS-CBN always manages to give the human form of  this face)

This portion (see photo, still of an ABS-CBN video used here non-commercially, for academic purposes) was shot in Rocs Coffesshop in U.P. Diliman,  Bahay ng Alumni; Rocs is the quieter, cozier, “fully cold” (full aircon) of the coffeeshops in U.P. that allow a full TV crew inside for interviews — thank you to Rocs for the wide windows facing the afternoon sun, with cream-colored paper blinds filtering the sunlight  — natural daylight,  good acoustics.

For those who were not able to see the segment, this blog will try to upload a teeny-weeny snippet for review and academic purposes.

On the TV production:  the entire produced segment  in “The Buzz”  (ABS-CBN) is  a 5- to 6- minute sequence composed of interviews of the subject (the talent, singer-actress Karyll), a video expert, etc., and presenting the side of the tabloid, and other parties involved, for an all-around discussion.  Half of the segment was devoted to an investigative angle showing that there really was no “nip slip” or no full breast exposure; that, according to the independent video expert consulted by “The Buzz”  whom they went to  after the interview with me in Rocs, the photo of Karyll had been photoshopped; and second, the talent was wearing taped breast cover. Therefore, some parts of the discussion in the previous blog post (below) on breast exposure  may not be applicable because, based on the investigation, the photo was manipulated. At the time of their interview with me, i did not know the image was photoshopped, the producers had a statement from the talent that she was wearing taped breast cover, so they independently investigated/ verified whether or not the photo had been photoshopped. The producers went to an independent video expert to establish the nature of the photo. Then, they interviewed Atty. Nery Colmenares (Hi, Nery!) after they saw the video expert. [i’m glad Atty. Nery Colmenares gave an interview, so my friends in the progressive movements cannot rib me! some friends tease me whenever i give TV inerviews]

Manipulating or “photoshopping” a photo to change its content, information, and meaning opens a whole lot of discussion on other legal and ethical issues.

Then, the segment had about 2 minutes on statements of the parties (the talent and her equally famous mom on twitter), then 2 minutes on legal discussion. Wait lang po for a short (2-minute) snippet video for academic discussion, i’ll post it in a while, promise!

DZMM radio: in a visual world: shining through

I saw in Korina’s show this morning that DZMM is now the number one channel on cable (not just on radio but on television cable). This one’s for the books, or some sort of a record, because television is a visual medium and DZMM is radio, it doesn’t have visuals except for headshots and medium shots of the radio anchors and sometimes, live streaming of video using 3G phone (grainy but really real-time), but it has  the most watched shows  on cable. I think I know why.

 

(Photo credits: Name of  photographer not indicated. Radio News: The Navy Wants 4,000 Radio Operators. From www.allposters.com under the terms of use of its free-service for blog  use. Used for here for educational and non-commercial purposes. )

 

  It has the widest network of regional correspondents in the Philippines and the most well-distributed pool of reporters and correspondents metro-wide compared to other tv news programs; its correspondents are in every nook and cranny, in every cliff and riverbed,  and they just call in all of a sudden while they’re breaking the news;  even at 2:00 am or 3:00 am they have correspondents and reporters who are awake, even the graveyard shift priest anchor in the radio booth   receives breaking news of some shooting incident somewhere at 3:00 am. That means that every minute, they have new news  stories, they don’t repeat their stories. That’s my theory on why it’s the most-watched (how can you compete with that); and the second reason, I think, is…. (in a visual medium where the most watched channel  is not that visual, you’ve got to do some thinking, and the second reason I think is):

 

           The radio anchors. The basis I think for putting the regular radio anchors ( the DZMM talents and not the politicians who buy block time for their radio program, I don’t watch politicians),  or the standard for choosing the radio anchors is, I think,  their WIT, SENSE OF HUMOR, their broadcaster’s voice (volume and quality; nobody’s mumbling or squeaking there), and their PERSONALITY. In fact, in dire situations, when they don’t have a  guest or a  co-host, or a reporter to break news, each of them can hold fort or hold a program for two hours straight, on their own, UNSCRIPTED, no prompters, just relying on their wit, their stock knowledge of what’s going on around them, the inside stories from their sources, all unscripted. How many can do that, enthrall an audience, for two hours straight,  with nothing in their hands, and just relying on their wit? That’s what I mean. The energy is high. Each has a  life force in him/ her worth watching even if it’s coming from a small  inset screen within a screen. Either you have it or you don’t,  that’s how it goes. Each, a character; they have many stories inside of them bursting to come out.