“You mentioned the navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets because the nature of our military’s changed,” (laughter from the audience.) – U.S. Pres. Barack Obama’s comeback to Gov. Mitt Romney, U.S. presidential debate 22 Oct. 2012
xxx xxx xxx
My dog-&-pony show
There are free-speech cases that date as far back as World War I. For the oldest case for discussion, we have a slideshow with World War I photos in black and white so students will know it was an entirely different world… Last year the department batted for the reinstatement of Kas I or Kasaysayan 1 (History class) in the G.E. course (it had been removed half a decade ago), I have students who think the Hukbalahap rose up against the Spanish colonizers in 1898; in one student’s slideshow (Ayer vs. RTC Judge Capulong & Enrile, a movie on the 1986 EDSA uprising) there were photos of EDSA rallies around the giant Mama Mary EDSA Shrine. Prof (turning her head counterclockwise to look at the slide from another angle): “is that… EDSA One?” Student: “Ma’m yes.” Prof: “Eh ano yangmonumento dyan (What’s that monument there?”) Student: “EDSA Shrine.” Prof: “And those are… flyovers, right?” Student: “yes” Prof: “so that’s… 1986?” (class laughs) Student: “ay mali, sorry”. (actually, this was a longer story; i had to explain that the flyovers were built in the 1990’s.) And so now, History 1 has been restored.
(wait a few seconds for wordpress to upload sample slides)
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
(Wait a few seconds for wordpress to upload sample slides)
And…for slideshows, if you will just read off a slide, don’t bother to make a presentation. A common mistake is when the presenter sits behind a desk…behind a laptop… and just clicks and reads the text off it…you might as well send a well-trained chihuahua to do that. Show the title slide . Then stand in front, not behind the desk or podium, in front! (or you can walk up and down during your talkies).
Give a short discussion of what will follow… then engage. Then…that’s when to click on the slide ; with sound effects if you like; put animation, then animate the text (handouts distributed earlier so the audience does not have to copy off the slides). Then discuss, engage. And so on. (finish with an “applause “ sound effects slide to amuse people).DO NOT READ OFF THE SLIDE –- discuss, engage, stand in front (instead of being attached to your computer).
And better yet — throw a question or two. Here and there. And here’s the bayonet question, Abrams vs. United States (1919), never fails:
9th slide: “It tells the Russian emigrants, …’Workers in the ammunition factories, you are producing bullets, bayonets, cannons to murder not only the Germans, but also your dearest, best, who are in Russia fighting for freedom.’
Breaking News. From interaksyon.com (online news of Channel 5) as of 1pm: SC stops Cybercrime Law by TRO.
“MANILA, Philippines – (UPDATE, 1:02 p.m.) The Supreme Court on Tuesday unanimously voted for the issuance of a temporary restraining order (TRO) stopping the enforcement of the controversial Cybercrime Prevention Act. All 14 justices were present. xxx
xxx
“The TRO was issued as the high tribunal deliberated en banc on 15 petitions from various groups and personalities from the media, lawyers’ and free-speech advocates’ sectors, all seeking a halt to implementation of the Cybercrime Prevention Act. xxx” ” – interaksyon.com
YES! Unanimous.
They read it. They know their constitutional law.
A TRO from the Supreme Court is indefinite in character. It is effective unless set aside, and it becomes permanent when the SC decides in favor of the petitioners.
(Updated as of 5:20 pm: The SC in its resolution limited the TRO to only 120 days, oral arguments set: Jan. 15, 2013. Merry Christmas!)
xxx (continuation of 1pm blog post)
Unconstitutional kayo, Senado, Konggreso, Malacañang !On your faces, er, este, on its face, the law is unconstitutional. “On its face” means just by a reading of the text.
Ipinilit pa ng Malacañang — violative of the right to be secure in one’s person, houses, papers, and effects, the right to privacy of communication and correspondence, the right against double jeopardy, the right to freedom from prior restraint, the free speech clause, etc. etc.
Mabuhay ang lahat ng netizens na pumalag at hindi pumayag sa Cybercrime Law!
(Salamat di na madilim ang blog ko)
See previous blog post, below, for context, posted five hours before issuance of TRO: